Sorry, I meant late spring, not late summer.
~Evan
--
Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Debian Project (http://www.debian.org/)
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 04:08:01PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
What is the current status of the work going on to try to make some of
the Creative Commons licenses acceptable according to the Debian free
software guidelines? I know there were a workgroup being formed in
March, and I
[Andrew Suffield]
I thought that had been sent back to them some time ago... we've seen
a draft that's probably okay except for a few details that are kinda
uncertain and some wording that's just plain weird.
Right. Perhaps there is some confusion somewhere, as Mr. Lessig did
not know about
So, here's what's been going on with the Debian-CC working group: we had a number of exchanges back and forth in the late summer, culminating in a draft license in early June. I pushed it too close to my wife's due date in making the response, and I've been dealing with a new baby in the last
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
What is the current status of the work going on to try to make some of
the Creative Commons licenses acceptable according to the Debian free
software guidelines? I know there were a workgroup being formed in
March, and I hope they are doing good work.
I spoke
[Nathanael Nerode]
If we knew which of the two suggestions did not have the effect
intended (and why), we could come up with plenty of alternate
suggestions. In addition, a few of our suggestions were of the
this is way too confusing to read variety rather than the this is
non-free variety,
What is the current status of the work going on to try to make some of
the Creative Commons licenses acceptable according to the Debian free
software guidelines? I know there were a workgroup being formed in
March, and I hope they are doing good work.
I spoke with Lawrence Lessig yesterday,
7 matches
Mail list logo
