On Wed, 07 Nov 2018, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Do we want WKD for debian.org, like gentoo.org and kernel.org?
>
> TIA for your opinions & Cheers
I'd look at code that generates WKD and dane information for users that
enable it in ldap.
--
| .''`. ** Debian
Guilhem Moulin writes ("Re: Support WKD (and WKS) for @debian.org email
addresses?"):
> On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 at 18:20:16 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Personally I think the hash is bizarre. Why make this protocol depend
> > on an obsolete hash function ? One could
Hi,
On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 at 18:20:16 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Personally I think the hash is bizarre. Why make this protocol depend
> on an obsolete hash function ? One could just url-encode the email
> address. The server could deal with case-folding etc.
Dunno if you'll find the arguments
W. Martin Borgert writes ("Support WKD (and WKS) for @debian.org email
addresses?"):
> One way to help senders getting the real receivers key is WKD (web key
> directory). That is one HTTPS URL per email address, e.g. a static
> directory with PGP key files. (See https:/
Hi,
just testing the waters, whether this is something people like or not:
As we all know, false PGP keys can easily be forged for any given
email address and uploaded to key servers. We've been there, even with
the correct short key ids and equally faked signatures!
One way to help senders
5 matches
Mail list logo
