Re: non-uploading Debian New Maintainer process

2010-11-08 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi! * Henri Le Foll deb...@lefoll.eu [2010-11-06 14:11:37 CET]: I will explain more clearly what I have tried to say on the two previous mail. Actually you have received feedback for that already, but let's try again. abbreviations --- There is no need to rename

Re: non-uploading Debian New Maintainer process

2010-11-08 Thread Enrico Zini
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 01:01:38PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: 4. Is it correct that now, the DNM process takes one year ? (See Applicants in Process on https://nm.debian.org/) It always did depend and always will depend on the individual applying, what they have done and how well they

non-uploading Debian New Maintainer process

2010-11-06 Thread Henri Le Foll
-uploading DD), I understand that the process is the same for uploading and non-uploading DD Debian Maintainer part of the Debian New Maintainer process = on terminologie - in jully there was an interesting

Re: The Debian New Maintainer process

2000-09-17 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Hi. This mail is just sent to the list. In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Tue, 12 Sep 2000 15:22:12 +, michael d. ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm glad I can help. When philh first asked me which areas I wanted to help in, during the NM process, I suggested NM, just because I knew it was so