On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 03:12:48PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
Which brings me to the DPL's involvment in this particular train of thought.
If the developer that is being asked to do something, or asked to discuss
something, is themself not motivated to do(discuss), then there is nothing
that the
Adam Heath wrote:
In the past several years, I have seen a few different DPLs in (in)action. I
have not seen the betterment of the Debian Project as a whole(as a result of
actions the DPLs have done), yet each DPL has said how well they have improved
the situation. Additionally, each
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 08 April 2004 08.02, Martin Schulze wrote:
Most of what the DPL does, you don't see.
The question then is: why is that so?
Is it because most of what the DPL is top secret and can not be
disclosed to a wider ausience? I don't
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 08 April 2004 08.02, Martin Schulze wrote:
Most of what the DPL does, you don't see.
The question then is: why is that so?
My memory often fails me but I'm pretty sure that I gave
If you agree with this as I do, then a simple I agree will suffice, sent
in public reply. Then, start doing real work.
If you don't agree, then by all means, waste your's and everyone else's
time, by actually attempting to discuss and disect this email. But those
who really care about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 08 April 2004 10.04, Martin Schulze wrote:
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 08 April 2004 08.02, Martin Schulze wrote:
Most of what the DPL does, you don't
I have not voted in this DPL election. I didn't vote in last year's. I think
I only voted in the first one, but even then, I'm not sure.
So, why have I not voted?
1) Lack of time?
The actual act of voting takes no time.
2) Lack of knowing the candidates?
Possible. See below.
3)
* Adam Heath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So, in summary(I'm rambled on long enough), I see no point in having a DPL.
Yeah, so, I disagree, yadda yadda.
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Cc'ed only to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have not voted in this DPL election. I didn't vote in last
year's. I think I only voted in the first one, but even then, I'm
not sure.
I always vote, probably for the same reasons I vote in my country's
elections
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Philippe Troin wrote:
I always vote, probably for the same reasons I vote in my country's
elections (mostly to prevent the people I disagree with the most to
get into office) and without having any trust nor hopes in the system
whatsoever.
Voting in real elections makes
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 03:12:48PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
If you agree with this as I do, then a simple I agree will
suffice, sent in public reply. Then, start doing real work.
The only thing I agree with you about is that actions speak louder than
words. Do real work and be happy.
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 03:12:48PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
In effect, the DPL is nothing more than a figurehead, that can change from
year to year.
In real life, figureheads are either:
[a] inanimate objects, or
[b] politicians who are put in place to conceal the real leaders.
I don't think
Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 03:47:40PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Philippe Troin wrote:
I always vote, probably for the same reasons I vote in my country's
elections (mostly to prevent the people I disagree with the most to
get into office) and
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 10:46:29PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 03:47:40PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Philippe Troin wrote:
I always vote, probably for the same reasons I vote in my country's
elections (mostly to
14 matches
Mail list logo
