Re: The archive.debian.org situation

Am 2005-06-06 22:56:46, schrieb Joey Hess: > snapshot.d.net already has most of the files in archive, at least for > newer distributions, and AFAIK plans to keep them indefinitely. Maybe I know, since Woody. I have a full debian-archive from Buzz to Potato (CD's only partialy).

Re: The archive.debian.org situation

Michelle Konzack wrote: > The Only Server I know, which is hosting buzz, rezz, bo, hamm, slink > and potato completly is and in the next > days will try to mirror the whole POTATO tree (without i386) which > is missing on my local 430 GByte Debian wirror. > > > Debian-ar

Re: The archive.debian.org situation

On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:28:06PM -0400, Anonymous wrote: > Full discosure: I'm not a DD, or a laywer, and yes the headers are correct, > I did write this message on windows, but not by choice, I'd rather be > running Debian on this box. Does Windows prevent you from including your real name i

Re: The archive.debian.org situation

On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 08:22:50PM -0400, Anonymous wrote: > Woody must remain in the main archive as old-stable for at least a few > weeks It'll remain there until security support is dropped, which (according to Joey Schulze) will be a year from sarge's release or the sarge+1 release, whichever

Re: The archive.debian.org situation

No it is not. Where did you get that idea? Damn... I must have missed that removal. :( I know for a fact it used to be. Archive should be brought back. It still exists in the form of still exisitng at ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian-archive/ but the most recent version is slink. Even if archive

Re: The archive.debian.org situation

Am 2005-05-30 12:28:06, schrieb Anonymous: > Actually potato is still in the main archive as old-stable. No, it is not. There is no Server which hold ols-stable. The Only Server I know, which is hosting buzz, rezz, bo, hamm, slink and potato completly is and in the nex

Re: The archive.debian.org situation

On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:28:06PM -0400, Anonymous wrote: > >, as of last night, two thirds > >were either incomplete (i.e., not carrying potato) or no longer > >operational. Shouldn't something be done about this situation? > >With archive.debian.org offlin

Re: The archive.debian.org situation

, as of last night, two thirds were either incomplete (i.e., not carrying potato) or no longer operational. Shouldn't something be done about this situation? With archive.debian.org offline, what will happen with the archiving and subsequent mirroring of woo

The archive.debian.org situation

It's been over a year since archive.debian.org went offline (see ). Of the 21 sites listed as mirroring the Debian archives at , as of last night, two thirds were either incomplete (i.e., not carrying