Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? [was: Re: bits from the DPL: August 2012]

2012-09-12 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 09:31:41PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: I am following up to your August bits from the DPL, since I still have to understand why it was suggested to dual license the Open Use Logo with Debian under LGPLv3+ / CC-by-sa-v3.0. I have already asked in

Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? [was: Re: bits from the DPL: August 2012]

2012-09-09 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 22:55:33 +0200 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: [...] - The DFGS-free logo relicensing I've mentioned last month is now on its way. Following advice from SFLC, I've slightly patched the current trademark policy (mainly to clarify scope), just enough to decouple logo