On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:30:53AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > Personally, I think the idea of a DD having to ack his nomination, though
> > only
> > after being nominated by some (Q?) fellow DDs would be better than a plain
> > self-nomination. What do others think?
>
> What would be bett
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 22:39 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Personally, I think the idea of a DD having to ack his nomination, though only
> after being nominated by some (Q?) fellow DDs would be better than a plain
> self-nomination. What do others think?
What would be better about it? I haven't seen
(moving away from private)
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally, I think the idea of a DD having to ack his nomination, though only
> after being nominated by some (Q?) fellow DDs would be better than a plain
> self-nomination. What do others think?
I fear it wouldn't work in practi
3 matches
Mail list logo
