Alexander Antoniades <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, I don't know where that statement came from. What became woody
> > was certainly the least buggy, most secure set of software we had at
> > the time when woody froze. Which was a long long time before release.
>
> Well in my opinion the
> don't know what your luck is like, but the Debian mirrors I've tried
> (wustl.edu and rutguers.edu) are overloaded about half the time I access
> them.
"apt-get install netselect" and then run this command:
netselect -vvv $(host http.us.debian.org | cut -f3)
It will tell you which official mi
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 12:40 pm, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> Which materials, at least of the ones on www.debian.org, are you
> referring to? Have you filed bugs for them or sumbitted feedback on
> them?
Well as far as conflicting I haven't found any on Debian.org, more outdated
documents like Dwarf
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In conclusion the person who wrote the review seemed like a smart
> fellow, maybe a little too smart, and should perhaps apply some of that
> intelligence towards considering how phenomenally popular debian has
> become, and why, before taking too stro
I hope I'm not speaking out of place, I'm a long time user first time poster,
recent subscriber. Id like to point out that there's a very good reason Linux
and debian are so popular. For many people, there is no choice. Unix is and has
been the industrial standard for a long long time. Debian as th
> > The fact that no version of Debian has a complete edition of KDE 3.x
> > doesn't make the argument that more people should use it any easier.
>
> Well, unstable does.
Actually, right now several critical pieces of KDE are missing from
unstable:
kdenetwork
kmail
kdepim
I've known at least one
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 11:40:08AM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> > While I can appreciate using limited resources to their fullest potential,
> > my
> > main issue with the no updates to Woody policy would have to do with
> > OpenOffice. IMHO OpenOffice is as significant to Linux on the desktop a
On Tue, 04 Mar 2003, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> Actaully, there are security team updates available for sarge; just
> put this in sources.list:
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main contrib non-free
This is wrong.
http://www.debian.org/security/faq#testing
The sarge/updates will
Alexander Antoniades <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is a lot of information available about Debian, but much of it
> is out of date
Which materials, at least of the ones on www.debian.org, are you
referring to? Have you filed bugs for them or sumbitted feedback on
them?
> > We do have a po
On Monday 03 March 2003 1:00 am, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> I can relieve you right away by saying I agree with that I thought the
> review was pretty balanced, I don't see anything in there that was
> unfair. Some things maybe I think had too much stress placed on them.
I appreciate your feedback and
Alexander, since I met you and answered some of your questions and
work with your brother, I felt I ought to just provide some of my
thoughts on your review, "A User Review of Debian GNU/Linux". I'll
just start with saying that my answers are colored by my experience of
being a Debian user since
11 matches
Mail list logo
