On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 10:43:30AM -0800, David N. Welton wrote:
DNW On the other hand, is it fair to entrust the project to a
DNW (potential) majority of developers who are still learning as they
DNW go, and who haven't been around that long?
It is fair. One maniac who thinks that he knows
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 11:57, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 10:43:30AM -0800, David N. Welton wrote:
DNW On the other hand, is it fair to entrust the project to a
DNW (potential) majority of developers who are still learning as they
DNW go, and who haven't been around that
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:06:52PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
ADvB With the difference that somebody who's likely to do something
ADvB like that would with a very very high probability never be
ADvB trusted doing any important thing.
Really? Looking at president of my
A few poorly-formed thoughts:
It seems we aren't even able to pick a system to let us vote, let
alone actually debating and voting on issues.
Maybe the answer isn't hyper-democracy, where everyone who maintains a
package gets to decide on every issue.
Maybe we ought to recognize that the power
4 matches
Mail list logo
