Re: dep5, whats the status? Re: DEP5: reasons for not pushing Bazaar changes to Subversion

2010-12-23 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Thursday 23 December 2010 12:51:59 Lars Wirzenius wrote: > I, personally, think it would be better to wait for the first version of > DEP5 that is marked CANDIDATE, which I intend to announce on > debian-devel-announce. Hopefully that will happen quite soon. Those who > already use some revision

Re: dep5, whats the status?

2010-12-23 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:51:59 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > Those who > already use some revision, such as pkg-perl, should stick to what they > are using now. Agreed, and the fact that r135 in svn hasn't changed for some time (and the development happened somewhere else) was actually helpful for

Re: dep5, whats the status? Re: DEP5: reasons for not pushing Bazaar changes to Subversion

2010-12-23 Thread Holger Levsen
thanks - looking forward to the announcement! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: dep5, whats the status? Re: DEP5: reasons for not pushing Bazaar changes to Subversion

2010-12-23 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On to, 2010-12-23 at 12:34 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > for those who are just marking mails in this thread as read... ;-) > > On Donnerstag, 23. Dezember 2010, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Using revision 135 of the DEP from svn.debian.org is a waste of time, for > > the people who would li

dep5, whats the status? Re: DEP5: reasons for not pushing Bazaar changes to Subversion

2010-12-23 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, for those who are just marking mails in this thread as read... ;-) On Donnerstag, 23. Dezember 2010, Charles Plessy wrote: > Using revision 135 of the DEP from svn.debian.org is a waste of time, for > the people who would like to write a copyright file, or for the peopole who > would like to