Re: having public irc logs?

Gianfranco Costamagna writes: > the main sadness comes to a lot of friends, sharing on "private/semi > public places" a lots of private pictures, without understanding the > damage that they might receive in case of leaks. > saying "I told you" doesn't help fixing the

Re: having public irc logs?

Hi! Gianfranco Costamagna: >>> I didn't suggest that, but privacy online is seriously something that >>> *doesn't* exist, and people not understanding that are simply wrong. I completely agree with Wouter. Well said. >> Your argument that some information on IRC might be useful does hold >>

Re: having public irc logs?

Hello Wouter! >> I didn't suggest that, but privacy online is seriously something that >> *doesn't* exist, and people not understanding that are simply wrong. > >I disagree strongly with this statement. the main sadness comes to a lot of friends, sharing on "private/semi public places" a lots

Re: having public irc logs?

On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 09:08:55AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:21:10PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > I didn't suggest that, but privacy online is seriously something that > > *doesn't* exist, and people not understanding that are simply wrong. > > I

Re: having public irc logs?

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > having *some* irc channels of public interest being available for offline > users? FYI, #debian on both OFTC and freenode are publicly logged: http://ibot.rikers.org/%23debian/ http://irclogs.thegrebs.com/debian/ -- bye, pabs

Re: having public irc logs?

On 07/04/2017 16:21, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > (this question was on debian-vote by purpose, and was directed to DPL, > I'll drop -vote on the next email) > >> (Replies redirected to debian-project, since this has nothing to do >> with the DPL election anymore.) > > > sigh, I agree > (I

Re: having public irc logs?

On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:21:10PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I didn't suggest that, but privacy online is seriously something that > *doesn't* exist, and people not understanding that are simply wrong. I disagree strongly with this statement. Privacy isn't a boolean thing. It's not

Re: having public irc logs?

(this question was on debian-vote by purpose, and was directed to DPL, I'll drop -vote on the next email) >(Replies redirected to debian-project, since this has nothing to do >with the DPL election anymore.) sigh, I agree (I would have used -devel to have a public discussion, this wasn't the