On 2007-11-28, Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:49:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:23:30PM +, Michael Banck wrote:
>> > Another thing we could do is alert sponsors about checking for lintian
>> > overrides when they review a pac
Bas Wijnen dijo [Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:51:30PM +0100]:
> > or we could disallow the override of >= E: errors in lintian, and make
> > lintian reboot your computer, fill your gpg with /dev/random bits, and
> > install windows over your Debian if you override such errors.
>
> Interesting idea.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:54:39PM +, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:49:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > or we could disallow the override of >= E: errors in lintian, and make
> > lintian reboot your computer, fill your gpg with /dev/random bits, and
> > install windo
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:55:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> aj, who'd just like to see some failure analysis / air crash investigation
>> type conclusions out of this, rather than just "foo sucks and
>> shouldn't upload"
>
> One thing we
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:49:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:23:30PM +, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:55:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > aj, who'd just like to see some failure analysis / air crash investigation
> > > type conclu
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:49:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:23:30PM +, Michael Banck wrote:
> > Another thing we could do is alert sponsors about checking for lintian
> > overrides when they review a package.
>
> or we could disallow the override of >= E: er
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 01:23:30PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:55:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> aj, who'd just like to see some failure analysis / air crash investigation
>> type conclusions out of this, rather than just "foo sucks and
>> shouldn't upload"
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:49:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> or we could disallow the override of >= E: errors in lintian, and make
> lintian reboot your computer, fill your gpg with /dev/random bits, and
> install windows over your Debian if you override such errors.
Are you routinely ove
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:23:30PM +, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:55:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > aj, who'd just like to see some failure analysis / air crash investigation
> > type conclusions out of this, rather than just "foo sucks and
> > shouldn't uplo
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:55:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> aj, who'd just like to see some failure analysis / air crash investigation
> type conclusions out of this, rather than just "foo sucks and
> shouldn't upload"
One thing we could do is have a seperate report on
http://lintian
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 09:44:50PM +0530, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
> As people have already explained, this is not the first mistake people
> have commited. And at the same time, I agree that it was a grave
> mistake on my part and I publicly apologize for this mistake. If you
> care to r
On Nov 26, 2007 5:14 PM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you care to rectify this by removing my account, by all means do so.
I do not like that idea and I have just sponsored an upload for Kartik
because I think he is doing a great job for Debian. I agree that he
was mi
On Nov 26, 2007 8:57 PM, Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In this case it's inaction, and it'd be better if you'd acknowledge the
> problem and do what you can to avoid it in future. From the above, it
> seems like when sponsoring packages you're not always:
>
> - testing to see if
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:34:21PM +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> > Kartik what possible reason did you have for overriding the lintian
> > error report, rather than changing your package to remove the error?
> linhdd introduce binary abs_fdisk which was modified copy of fdisk
> from new version 0.4
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 11:22:52PM +0530, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
> [I did not recieve the original email addressed to me by aj, so I am
> literally "reading between the lines" to digest the original message]
It was sent to your @d.o address, and is in the list archives at:
http://l
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Mohammed and Jaldhar, as advocates (and AM) of Kartik, do you have
> anything to add here?
What I have to add is:
1) Kartik is very reactive in correcting his packages when an error
is found
2) Kartik has not finished NM yet as I have to check (all) his
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:18:46PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> So... Well, I do hope this public flaming regarding the fdisk messup
> is enough to fix the mistake (not minor by any means, but still a
> mistake) he did.
I think this misses the point. Giving someone DM privileges is a
declaration t
Jaldhar H. Vyas dijo [Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 11:13:29AM -0500]:
> >Mohammed and Jaldhar, as advocates (and AM) of Kartik, do you have
> >anything to add here?
> >
>
> Mainly I have worked with Kartik on Debian-IN packages and there I
> have no complaints. Lately, I have been sponsoring some of his
On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 00:14 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Mohammed and Jaldhar, as advocates (and AM) of Kartik, do you have
> anything to add here?
Out of Kartik's NM page:
Application Manager Comments
P&P1: [done] 20070417
P&P2: [done] 20070529
T&S1: [done] 20070812
T&S2: [done] 20071007
p
[I did not recieve the original email addressed to me by aj, so I am
literally "reading between the lines" to digest the original message]
"Kartik Mistry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Ramakrishnan, how did your sponsorship checking miss both this error
>> and the RC bug (442093) the previous up
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
Mohammed and Jaldhar, as advocates (and AM) of Kartik, do you have
anything to add here?
Mainly I have worked with Kartik on Debian-IN packages and there I have no
complaints. Lately, I have been sponsoring some of his other packages and
on the oc
On Nov 24, 2007 7:44 PM, Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ramakrishnan, Mohammed, Jaldhar, Kartik,
Hi all,
Please read me inline.
> It's been pointed out that Kartik's latest upload of linhdd has included
> an i386 binary in arch:all package, and explicitly overriden the lintian
> w
Hi Ramakrishnan, Mohammed, Jaldhar, Kartik,
It's been pointed out that Kartik's latest upload of linhdd has included
an i386 binary in arch:all package, and explicitly overriden the lintian
warning for it (see the mail quoted below). That seems pretty dodgy.
Kartik what possible reason did you h
23 matches
Mail list logo
