On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 19:34:20 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:38:51PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> >I discovered that [EMAIL PROTECTED] rejects any
> >mails from non-subscribers
>
> Rejects or holds back?
>
Rejects. Holding back for moderation would be just fine,
This one time, at band camp, Luk Claes said:
> Jonas Meurer wrote:
> > As I think that the current situation is not acceptable, I suggest that
> > alioth admins overwrite the current posting policy for pkg-grub-devel.
>
> Wrong, alioth admins should make sure the default is sane, but they
> should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:38:51PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>I discovered that [EMAIL PROTECTED] rejects any
>mails from non-subscribers
Rejects or holds back?
>This topic has already been discussed in the past, and to my knowledge
>it has been ag
Am Mittwoch, den 10.09.2008, 17:38 +0200 schrieb Jonas Meurer:
> I discovered that [EMAIL PROTECTED] rejects any
> mails from non-subscribers even though the address is listed as
> maintainers contact address for grub packages in Debian. This topic has
> already been discussed in the past, and to
Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I discovered that [EMAIL PROTECTED] rejects any
> mails from non-subscribers even though the address is listed as
> maintainers contact address for grub packages in Debian. This topic has
> already been discussed in the past, and to my knowledge it has been
> agree
Hello,
I discovered that [EMAIL PROTECTED] rejects any
mails from non-subscribers even though the address is listed as
maintainers contact address for grub packages in Debian. This topic has
already been discussed in the past, and to my knowledge it has been
agreed that the described situation is
6 matches
Mail list logo
