Re: similarities between logos for CLUSTER and Debian

2015-01-14 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Richard Hartmann richih.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote: * WANAL, but as we understand it the current situation already gives us a legal standing if we need it I have been asked to clarify. Long-term use gives us protection under Common Law. This is harder to

Re: similarities between logos for CLUSTER and Debian

2015-01-13 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote: On Sun, 04 Jan 2015, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote: The debian swirl is trademarked, but freely licensed. I don't think so: http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=docstate=4803:q33o33.2.1 The mark consists of a

Re: similarities between logos for CLUSTER and Debian

2015-01-12 Thread Josselin Mouette
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: I don't think so: http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=docstate=4803:q33o33.2.1 The mark consists of a spiral formed with the style of a paintbrush stroke with the word debian written. And there are much simpler trademarks out there.

Re: similarities between logos for CLUSTER and Debian

2015-01-07 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote: The debian swirl is trademarked, but freely licensed. I don't think so: http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=docstate=4803:q33o33.2.1 The mark consists of a spiral formed with the style of a paintbrush stroke with the word debian written.

Re: similarities between logos for CLUSTER and Debian

2015-01-06 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:02:31PM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: On 01/04/2015 at 11:41 AM, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote: The debian swirl is trademarked, but freely licensed. However, this isn't our swirl. And I don't think it's adding confusion. If you want, you can email trademarks@ :)

Re: similarities between logos for CLUSTER and Debian

2015-01-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote: Just for some fun, I've found another (debian?) swirl in a very different business, a string instruments maker in Romania. See first and last pages of their cello catalog: http://www.gliga.ro/cello.pdf I expect this is due to the

similarities between logos for CLUSTER and Debian

2015-01-04 Thread Erik Galicki
Consortium Linking Universities of Science and Technology for Education and Research (CLUSTER): http://www.cluster.org/ CLUSTER, but maybe not its logo, appears to pre-date Debian. Given that Georgia Tech is a CLUSTER member and a secondary Debian mirror, I'd be surprised if the similarity in

Re: similarities between logos for CLUSTER and Debian

2015-01-04 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
That is ok since swirl itself is not trademarked (must come with Debian) On January 4, 2015 9:45:30 AM EST, Erik Galicki erik.gali...@gmail.com wrote: Consortium Linking Universities of Science and Technology for Education and Research (CLUSTER): http://www.cluster.org/ CLUSTER, but maybe not

Re: similarities between logos for CLUSTER and Debian

2015-01-04 Thread Paul R. Tagliamonte
The debian swirl is trademarked, but freely licensed. However, this isn't our swirl. And I don't think it's adding confusion. If you want, you can email trademarks@ :) On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko y...@onerussian.com wrote: That is ok since swirl itself is not

Re: similarities between logos for CLUSTER and Debian

2015-01-04 Thread The Wanderer
On 01/04/2015 at 11:41 AM, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote: The debian swirl is trademarked, but freely licensed. However, this isn't our swirl. And I don't think it's adding confusion. If you want, you can email trademarks@ :) Personally, I've been more confused by the swirl which is the

Re: similarities between logos for CLUSTER and Debian

2015-01-04 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:02:31PM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: Personally, I've been more confused by the swirl which is the current Dreamwidth favicon; Yeah, but it doesn't add confusion to the marketplace. For instance, if you went out and bought something you thought was Debian, but it was