On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:14:15PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 07:35:27PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Many of our mailinglists are virtually unuseable due to the spam volume.
BTW, just in case anyone's wondering about the recent spam flurry, that's
due to a bug on
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 11:14:45AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:14:15PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
BTW, just in case anyone's wondering about the recent spam flurry, that's
due to a bug on lists.debian.org that's still being worked on.
Wouldn't most spam be
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:14:15PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
Many of our mailinglists are virtually unuseable due to the spam volume.
BTW, just in case anyone's wondering about the recent spam flurry, that's
due to a bug on lists.debian.org that's still being worked on.
On the same note,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 07:35:27PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Many of our mailinglists are virtually unuseable due to the spam volume.
BTW, just in case anyone's wondering about the recent spam flurry, that's
due to a bug on lists.debian.org that's still being worked on.
--
2. That which
Marco d'Itri writes (spam sent to debian.org addresses):
What's wrong with our mail system? Why can't the debian admins blacklist
a well known spammer, or even better use a reputable DNSBL like SBL?
I too find that the amount of spam I get via Debian systems is quite a
problem. Many of our
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 08:27:42PM +, Marco d'Itri wrote:
A lot of legitimate mail can be trivially blocked this way, as well, which
is why it doesn't make sense to drop it on the server side.
No. Using SBL definitely does not block a lot of legitimate mail.
in some cases it does. using
On Fri, 2 May 2003, Robert Lemmen wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 08:27:42PM +, Marco d'Itri wrote:
A lot of legitimate mail can be trivially blocked this way, as well, which
is why it doesn't make sense to drop it on the server side.
No. Using SBL definitely does not block a lot of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A lot of legitimate mail can be trivially blocked this way, as well, which
is why it doesn't make sense to drop it on the server side.
No. Using SBL definitely does not block a lot of legitimate mail.
in some cases it does. using SPEWS for example would lead to all of
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 08:53:31AM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
A big part of the spam can be trivially blocked at the point where it enters
the Debian servers, using DNSRBLs and other sensible restrictions. When it
enters my mailer, it can not be trivially blocked as
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 08:53:31AM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von
Bidder wrote:
A big part of the spam can be trivially blocked at the point where it
enters
the Debian servers, using DNSRBLs and other sensible restrictions. When it
enters my mailer, it
On Thursday 01 May 2003 15:36, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 08:53:31AM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von
Bidder wrote:
A big part of the spam can be trivially blocked at the point where it
enters the Debian servers, using DNSRBLs and other sensible restrictions.
When it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A lot of legitimate mail can be trivially blocked this way, as well, which
is why it doesn't make sense to drop it on the server side.
No. Using SBL definitely does not block a lot of legitimate mail.
--
ciao,
Marco
On Wednesday 30 April 2003 22:50, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 08:50:43PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
What's wrong with our mail system? Why can't the debian admins blacklist
a well known spammer, or even better use a reputable DNSBL like SBL?
I asked the same questions to
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 08:50:43PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
What's wrong with our mail system? Why can't the debian admins blacklist
a well known spammer, or even better use a reputable DNSBL like SBL?
I asked the same questions to the debian admins but nobody ever replied,
I'm sick of
14 matches
Mail list logo
