Hi Raphael!
* Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org [2009-11-10 00:36]:
But indeed it's only a proposal at this point. The release team needs
to set a date in stone now.
If you're talking about the Ubuntu release team that's up to them. If
you talk about the Debian release team then I don't
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:35:45AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Luk proposed a new freeze date of march 2010:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg2.html
But indeed it's only a proposal at this point. The release team needs
to set a date in stone now.
Does it?
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:11:08 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:35:45AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg2.html
But indeed it's only a proposal at this point. The release team needs
to set a date in stone
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Martin Wuertele wrote:
If you're talking about the Ubuntu release team that's up to them. If
you talk about the Debian release team then I don't think so. A
proposale is a proposal not a policy.
I don't get your point. How do you go from a proposed freeze date
to a
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Sure, if most DDs have just took that mail as a proposal that they can
safely ignore, the release team should probably be more precise, but I
doubt the substance will be anything else than what we have now. (I also
duly notice that the release
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Sure, if most DDs have just took that mail as a proposal that they can
safely ignore, the release team should probably be more precise, but I
doubt the substance will be anything else than what we have now. (I also
duly
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes:
Luk proposed a new freeze date of march 2010:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg2.html
Ah, this message came in while I was on vacation and I somehow missed it.
Thank you. This answers my questions.
--
Russ Allbery
not seen anything further, and I have seen Ubuntu folks
talking about the Debian squeeze release cycle as if it's a sure thing and
we've already decided. It's also come up in a few other contexts in
Debian. However, I don't think we *have* decided, so I'm concerned that
we're giving people incorrect
was with a statement that no decision had been made and the
release team and others were going to think about this and provide more
information later.
Since then, I've not seen anything further, and I have seen Ubuntu folks
talking about the Debian squeeze release cycle as if it's a sure thing
Hello,
There is still a staged proposal that could benefit BOTH entities that still
remains unanswered by Canonical:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2009/08/msg00273.html
Regards.
Andre Felipe Machado
http://www.techforce.com.br
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:50:36PM -0600, Robbie Williamson wrote:
I can't speak for all of Ubuntu, but the only thing I have heard is a
*proposal* to freeze in March.
I read[0] that 'lucid lynx' (being LTS) will sync from 'testing' as opposed to
'unstable'. Does this affect affect Debian's
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 21:19 -0200, Andre Felipe Machado wrote:
Hello,
There is still a staged proposal that could benefit BOTH entities that still
remains unanswered by Canonical:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2009/08/msg00273.html
Ah, yes...I can answer this. We are *very*
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
So, there was a long discussion here after Debconf about the merits or
lack thereof of a freeze date at the end of this year for a squeeze
release early next year. My general feeling of the discussion was that
there was a fair bit of opposition to
On Mon, Nov 09 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
So, there was a long discussion here after Debconf about the merits or
lack thereof of a freeze date at the end of this year for a squeeze
release early next year. My general feeling of the discussion was
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
critical bugs. That gave to nice aphorisms like release when
ready, but did not really cater to timeliness of the releases.
We are speaking of the freeze date, not the release date.
other way: Where timeliness trumps the quality. We also have
15 matches
Mail list logo
