On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:34:41PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
He's doing more than interpret the results. He claims they are ambigous,
and that his interpretation is based on his speculation on what he thinks
the developers want.
No, instead of whining and acusing people you should try to
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:37:28PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 09:26:20PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
We're having a serious discussion, and you guys are adding noise. If you
want to make jokes, please at least start a separate thread.
...
That goes for you, too.
Robert Millan wrote:
So, I'll stop now. Do not think this means the problem just got solved. I
only do it because I expect we can have a healthy discussion about it after
Lenny is released.
Thanks.
Regards,
Joey
--
Life is a lot easier when you have someone to share it with. --
Thanks for your courage and honesty.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
With the upload of debian-maintainers version 1.52, the following
changes to the keyring have been made:
i...@jhr-online.de
Full name: Jan Hauke Rahm
Added key: D26FB242AAA167AC310E69F718EA7A5DE0FC710D
michael.ha...@ovgu.de
Full name: Michael Hanke
Added key:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:35:22AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
How about you going elsewhere until Lenny is released, then coming back
as soon as that happens and start working on what is left to fix then?
(Not right before a release, right after a release for a change.)
A VERY BIG +1
--
Hm.
It seems we have a number of projet-wide discussions that we've more or
less agreed to postpone until lenny is out. I have a moderate fear that
once that happens, they are going to explode (the discussions) all over
the lists.
I suggested the creation of the DiscussionsAfterLenny wiki page a
Robert Millan r...@aybabtu.com writes:
So, I'll stop now. Do not think this means the problem just got
solved. I only do it because I expect we can have a healthy
discussion about it after Lenny is released.
Best wishes to everyone,
Thank you. Sincerely. I think this will mean we can
Hi,
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
apologies for the cross-post, choose your favorite one of the two to reply.
search.debian.org[1], a slightly patched xapian-omega instance, is
looking for a kind DD (or a team?) to pick it up. Some more improvements
to the language support would be desirable, that
I don't know how many of you caught sight of this article about Ubuntu in the
New York Times, its an amusingly stilted read.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/business/11ubuntu.html
I know its now considered bad form to whine about Ubuntu's chronic success at
taking credit for Debian's
Ean Schuessler e...@brainfood.com writes:
I don't know how many of you caught sight of this article about Ubuntu
in the New York Times, its an amusingly stilted read.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/business/11ubuntu.html
It's a dreadful article. It's characteristic of the worst sort of
Robert Millan writes (Re: Results of the Lenny release GR):
Actually, I accept the outcome of the last vote. I don't like that we made
an exception for firmware, but the developers chose to make one so there's no
point in arguing about it.
On the other hand, it appears that the Secretary,
Adeodato Simó writes (Scheduling project-wide post-lenny discussions?):
It seems we have a number of projet-wide discussions that we've more or
less agreed to postpone until lenny is out. I have a moderate fear that
once that happens, they are going to explode (the discussions) all over
the
Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Robert Millan [Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:22:58 +0100]:
Currently, the only solution I see is that we ask the developers what they
think, and hold another vote.
Yes, I'm realizing myself there is not going to be another way. :-(
Proposal: hand Robert Millan a nice
Robert Millan wrote:
OTOH, if you just tell me to go elsewhere, I'm sorry but I don't want to
look the other way while the project destroys its reputation for having a
commitment to freedom, a democratic system and a set of principles.
The only one who works on destroying the project at the
15 matches
Mail list logo
