Quoting Jim Penny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 11:44:27PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 07:22:36AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Anthony Towns writes:
[...]
> BTW: I have no feeling about dropping python-2.0; it appears that
> portation from 2.0
Kim Oldfield writes:
> On 10 Dec 2001, Matthias Klose typed:
> ] Anthony Towns writes:
> ] > Dropping python1.5 doesn't seem a particularly clever thing to do.
> ] If we don't have any python1.5 dependencies, why not?
>
> Because users will have no way of having both 1.5 and 2.1 on the same
> mach
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Jim Penny wrote:
> For what its worth, probably very little, I agree with aj. I have a
> zope 2.3 site.
If I'm not completely wrong Zope 2.3 runs perfectly with Python 2.1.
So at least this is no reason to keep Python 1.5. (I'm not talking
about other things - just regarding
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 11:44:27PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 07:22:36AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Anthony Towns writes:
> > > python1.5's still useful to users, isn't it, especially ones with
> > > important python programs
> > that was the precondition for the re
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
> > On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:00:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > If I don't hear a serious reason to keep python1.5, I plan to file a
> > > bug report for ftp.debian.org to remove the python1.5 package.
> >
> > Eh?
> >
> >
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 07:22:36AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
> > python1.5's still useful to users, isn't it, especially ones with
> > important python programs
> that was the precondition for the removal. Currently there are xtalk
> and python-pam. I do not count pydb, b
Concerne : Enregistrement des domaines *.INFO et .BIZ
Ce courrier vous est envoyé par http://Yawadoo.com
(enregistrement .INFO .BIZ .BE .COM ..ORG .NET ..DE)
Agent agrée pour l'enregistrement de noms de domaines européens et étrangers.
-
Jérôme Marant (2001-12-09 20:26:49 +0100) :
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> It looks like the move to python (v2.1) is done. There are three
>> packages remaining:
> ...
>> These packages are:
>>
>> - pychecker
>> - python-pqueue
>> - python-egenix-mxbase
>> - python1.5-imaging
On 10 Dec 2001, Matthias Klose typed:
] Anthony Towns writes:
] > Dropping python1.5 doesn't seem a particularly clever thing to do.
] If we don't have any python1.5 dependencies, why not?
Because users will have no way of having both 1.5 and 2.1 on the same
machine as the woody python2.1 package
On Dec 10, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Donovan Baarda writes:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 11:53:24AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:00:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > If I don't hear a serious reason to keep python1.5, I plan to file a
> > > > bug report for ftp.
Donovan Baarda writes:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 11:53:24AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:00:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > If I don't hear a serious reason to keep python1.5, I plan to file a
> > > bug report for ftp.debian.org to remove the python1.5 package.
Anthony Towns writes:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:00:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > If I don't hear a serious reason to keep python1.5, I plan to file a
> > bug report for ftp.debian.org to remove the python1.5 package.
>
> Eh?
>
> python1.5's still useful to users, isn't it, especially o
12 matches
Mail list logo
