Re: Packaging, supporting both 2.1 and 2.2

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 04:34:18AM -, Moshe Zadka wrote: > On Thu, 23 May 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donovan Baarda) wrote: [...] > > This situation is identical to the existing idle package. It's worth looking > > at how it handles it. > > I'll take a look, thanks. Note the naming convention '

Re: Packaging, supporting both 2.1 and 2.2

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 04:34:18AM -, Moshe Zadka wrote: > > > 1a) as 1), but also provide foo symlink for python (default). > > this makes senseI can just put the symlink in python2.1-foo-bin and > move the symlinks when a python default change. Or you can use the update-alternatives to