Re: Maintaining Python 1.5

2002-09-11 Thread Moshe Zadka
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do not mind passing the maintainership, but I do mind keeping it in > unstable. Debian is not a museum for old python versions. What hinders > you to install the python1.5 packages from woody in unstable? apt > tagging is your frie

Re: dependencies of non-module packages

2002-09-11 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 02:49:24PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > * Graham Wilson > > | On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:08:36AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > | > Until dpkg supports triggers, I think what the emacsen does it the > | > most sane -- I'd be really, really happy if python modules/apps

Re: dependencies of non-module packages

2002-09-11 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* (Donovan Baarda) | On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 02:49:24PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | > Those scripts get a parameter saying which emacsen which is being | > installed, so they can decide whether they work with that version or | > not. | | If they don't work with that version, then what? Are

Re: Maintaining Python 1.5

2002-09-11 Thread Neil Schemenauer
Matthias Klose wrote: > Moshe Zadka writes: > > I was wondering if you mind passing Python 1.5 maintainership to me. > > I do not mind passing the maintainership, but I do mind keeping it in > unstable. I don't think it is up to individual Debian developers to decide what packages should be allow

Re: Maintaining Python 1.5

2002-09-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Neil Schemenauer writes: > Matthias Klose wrote: > > Moshe Zadka writes: > > > I was wondering if you mind passing Python 1.5 maintainership to me. > > > > I do not mind passing the maintainership, but I do mind keeping it in > > unstable. > > I don't think it is up to individual Debian developer

Re: Maintaining Python 1.5

2002-09-11 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On Wednesday 11 September 2002 15:00, Matthias Klose wrote: > Neil Schemenauer writes: > > Matthias Klose wrote: > > > Moshe Zadka writes: > > > > I was wondering if you mind passing Python 1.5 maintainership to me. > > > > > > I do not mind passing the maintainership, but I do mind keeping it in >

Re: #158930: python-pmw needs rebuilt against python 2.2

2002-09-11 Thread Michael Banck
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 01:15:55PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >Actually on second thought we better stick with the current > python-pmw_0.8.5-6 adjusted to build against python 2.2. Things > like pymol are having issues running with pmw 1.1. The patches > required to get python-pmw_0.8.5-6 bui