Le sam 09/08/2003 à 02:24, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Please upgrade your packages soon, or ask on debian-python for NMU's or help.
> If the package doesn't work with 2.3, please explicitely depend on the 2.2
> packages.
>
> I'll do NMU's for some "base" packages, if I see missing these packages.
Hi. What's the status of the python 2.2->2.3 transition of the
following packages:
pyvorbis
python-pmw
python-id3
pymad
My package mc-foo depends on those all, and I really can't upload
a newer version before the libraries have updat
Argh, I had the wrong domain in just about everything..
Now the To: is correct, please reply to this message instead ;)
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 06:45:20PM +0300, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
> Hi. What's the status of the python 2.2->2.3 transition of the
> following packages:
hello all. i am the developer of pygame and a debian/sid user. (note,
the debian package is maintained by ed boraas, not me.)
i noticed yesterday an upgrade to some python package is blocked by
pygame (at least what i can tell). i can't tell but it looks like an
update to python-numeric is the
This one time, at band camp, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
>> Hi. What's the status of the python 2.2->2.3 transition of the
>> following packages:
>> pymad
When I get a round tuit. I plan on building new packages next weekend, I'm
currently engrossed in gnucash as it's tax time.
--
[EM
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 04:27:31PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Am I the only one who has a disgusting reminiscence of netscape*.* packages
> > every time python* is mentioned? :P
>
> Actually I'm more reminded of the perl* packages and the complete mess
> that followed. And I
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-2
Severity: serious
This is strange... I am able to reproduce this. Something to do with
the new glibc (on i386 only?)?
- Packages built yesterday (using python2.3-3) are ok, see gadly in
http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/python/
- The same package built after th
7 matches
Mail list logo
