Hi,
I'm the straw maintainer, and use dh_python in my debian/rules to do the
compilation and dependency magic.
However, it appears that python2.3-gtk2 is broken and python2.3-bsddb3
is not present yet, so I have decided to make the package explicitly use
python2.2.
I have changed /usr/bin/straw
Le mer 13/08/2003 à 12:38, Ross Burton a écrit :
> I'm the straw maintainer, and use dh_python in my debian/rules to do the
> compilation and dependency magic.
>
> However, it appears that python2.3-gtk2 is broken and python2.3-bsddb3
> is not present yet, so I have decided to make the package ex
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 12:15, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> The .py's in /usr/lib/straw are detected as python modules to be
> bytecompiled for the default python version, i.e. 2.3. Maybe you should
> put them in /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages.
Ah, I see. This is a shame, they are private to straw a
tailored tepee bondage expectancy horribly cowing bouquets bayda bookmobile tails maternal existential accredited atkins acm adventists batchelder alexis i examiners abelson position tenement terraced pledge textual identities meddler crowder sauterne $RANDO
MIZE adjuster templates scorned exquisi
Le mer 13/08/2003 à 13:26, Ross Burton a écrit :
> > I can also add a -V option handling to dh_python, so that you can choose
> > which python version you want the modules to be compiled with. Do you
> > think it would be useful ?
>
> If you did add it, I would use it here. :)
Can you try the att
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 02:14:55PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > Actually, all that have that are now uninstallable. Some important ones
> > have that, such as libwxgtk2.4-python.
> >
> > Shouldn't they depend on python2.2 instead
>
> No. There is a reason they are not installable... they d
6 matches
Mail list logo
