'gramps' showed in my list of held-back programs today.
It is held back because it depends on python2.3-xmlbase.
When I try to install python2.3-xmlbase, apt-get tells me:
Note, selecting python2.3 instead of python2.3-xmlbase
python2.3 is already the newest version.
--
"Be regular and orderly
- Original Message
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Summary of python transition problems
Date: 29/09/03 10:49
Hi,
>
> (cc'ed to -release for general information)
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Here's a sum
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 03:21:42PM -, Alastair wrote:
> From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Missing builds
> > ==
> >
> > * newt: hppa
>
> Is this an error /out of date? From the archive,
> it appears that hppa is up-to-date on newt for
> both sarge and sid.
Slightly out
(cc'ed to -release for general information)
Hi folks,
Here's a summary of the problems currently blocking python2.3 from
testing. It may be slightly incomplete, but I think I've got most of
them.
Buggy packages
==
* garchiver: #210828
* gimp-python: #207304
* lincredits: co
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:49:03AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
[ a list of packages skipped ]
is libmetakit-python missing from this list for a reason?
--
Misha
pgpJaTCkadaOr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:16:37PM +0100, Mikhail Sobolev wrote:
> is libmetakit-python missing from this list for a reason?
It depends on python2.2, which isn't a problem as far as testing's
concerned. Packages depending on 'python (>= 2.2), python (<< 2.3)' are
problematic.
--
Colin Watson
> (cc'ed to -release for general information)
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Here's a summary of the problems currently blocking python2.3 from
> testing. It may be slightly incomplete, but I think I've got most of
> them.
>
>
> Buggy packages
> ==
[...]
what about python2.3 having "Depends: pytho
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-29 11:49]:
> Buggy packages
> ==
>
> * garchiver: #210828
I requested its removal a while ago (#212383).
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:29:12PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> what about python2.3 having "Depends: python (>= 2.3)"
>
> This is IMHO a policy violation. python (2.3) should depend on python2.3,
> python2.3 should not depend on python.
>
> It's playing havoc with my mixed testing/unstable sys
Colin Watson writes:
> Buggy packages
> ==
gnue-* is missing here.
Colin Watson writes:
> (cc'ed to -release for general information)
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Here's a summary of the problems currently blocking python2.3 from
> testing. It may be slightly incomplete, but I think I've got most of
> them.
fyi, yesterday I updated the list from Joss, see
http://people.de
Colin Watson writes:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:29:12PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > what about python2.3 having "Depends: python (>= 2.3)"
> >
> > This is IMHO a policy violation. python (2.3) should depend on python2.3,
> > python2.3 should not depend on python.
> >
> > It's playing havoc
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * python-gnome2: s390
Due to #212854 on gnome-vfs2 ... I'll probably NMU gnome-vfs2 soon if
Takuo KITAME doesn't fix it.
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 06:50, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Colin Watson writes:
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:29:12PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > > what about python2.3 having "Depends: python (>= 2.3)"
> > >
> > > This is IMHO a policy violation. python (2.3) should depend on python2.3,
> > > pyt
* Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-29 22:47]:
> but one of it's build-dep's is listed as:
> -gimp1.2 (1.2.3-2.4 to -)
> * Maintainer: Ben Gertzfield
> * Valid candidate
> so probably, it doesn't make sense to move it to testing, if gimp1.2
> is removed.
Actually, gimp1.2 still
15 matches
Mail list logo
