Re: downgrading optimization for m68k [was: Bug#328453: pbzip2_0.9.4-1(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k]

2005-09-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Joe Wreschnig writes: > On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 21:00 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Joe Wreschnig writes: > > > I guess I should ask here, too. Does anyone know why Python is compiled > > > with -O3 rather than -O2? Also, does anyone know the best way to > > > override distutils on a per-arch basi

Re: downgrading optimization for m68k [was: Bug#328453: pbzip2_0.9.4-1(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k]

2005-09-16 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 21:00 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Joe Wreschnig writes: > > I guess I should ask here, too. Does anyone know why Python is compiled > > with -O3 rather than -O2? Also, does anyone know the best way to > > override distutils on a per-arch basis to change that? > > There's o

Re: downgrading optimization for m68k [was: Bug#328453: pbzip2_0.9.4-1(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k]

2005-09-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Joe Wreschnig writes: > I guess I should ask here, too. Does anyone know why Python is compiled > with -O3 rather than -O2? Also, does anyone know the best way to > override distutils on a per-arch basis to change that? There's only one optimization macro to build the interpreter and the modules.

Re: debian default python version for sid/etch and python-kde3 status

2005-09-16 Thread Derrick Hudson
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 08:59:16AM -0400, Colin J. Williams wrote: | Matthias Klose wrote: | >Fathi Boudra writes: | > | >>i want to know the debian default python version for sid/etch, probably | >>2.4 but don't find any informations about this. | >the current version is still 2.3. We are delay

Re: downgrading optimization for m68k [was: Bug#328453: pbzip2_0.9.4-1(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k]

2005-09-16 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 00:37 -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 19:47 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > If you have a patch that fixes the ICEs on m68k, by all means please forward > > it to the BTS. > > > > But a larger question is, why are so many packages being built entirely wit