Le vendredi 13 janvier 2006 à 15:31 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> sorry, what is complicated about the solution?
>
> please read again, these benefits aren't just aesthetic:
>
> - working on metadata without having all packages available (which
> ones?) is not just aesthetic.
What exactly
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le vendredi 13 janvier 2006 à 15:31 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> > sorry, what is complicated about the solution?
> >
> > please read again, these benefits aren't just aesthetic:
> >
> > - working on metadata without having all packages available (which
> > ones?
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 12:40:09PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Josselin Mouette writes:
> > Le vendredi 13 janvier 2006 à 15:31 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> > > - beeing able to support more python versions in a separate archive
> > > is not just aesthetic (although not needed in the dist
Le lundi 16 janvier 2006 à 12:40 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> > Looking at the mailing list archives, some people have tried to initiate
> > discussions about making python in Debian evolve in the recent months,
> > but it doesn't look like there has been much interest.
>
> please see debian-
Josselin Mouette writes:
> > correct, but making it easier for extensions and applications using
> > private modules as well. when will python-support be able to support
> > these?
>
> Python-support already handles private modules. As for extensions, I
> don't think we should change the current p
Le lundi 16 janvier 2006 à 15:24 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> > Python-support already handles private modules. As for extensions, I
> > don't think we should change the current packaging practise. Packaging
> > them is already complicated enough as it is.
>
> yes, a reason to simplify this.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 09:45:29PM -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:
> I saw today that the python-minimal package in unstable is tagged as
> Essential (and currently pulls in python2.3). According to policy,
> this is supposed to happen only after discussion on debian-devel and
> consensus is reached, bu
7 matches
Mail list logo