Hi everyone
I would be glad to join the python-modules packaging team.
My alioth login is afayolle, and for those who dwell there, my irc nick
is agurney.
Thanks,
--
Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France)
Formations Python, Zope, Plone, Debian: http://www.log
Apologies for the French subject line in the previous mail. I'm
resending in case it caused it to be trapped by spam filters.
I would be glad to join the python-modules packaging team.
My alioth login is afayolle, and for those who dwell there, my irc nick
is agurney.
Thanks,
--
Alexandre F
Hi,
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
> Apologies for the French subject line in the previous mail. I'm
> resending in case it caused it to be trapped by spam filters.
>
> I would be glad to join the python-modules packaging team.
Welcome to the group! You have been added and you w
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Here's a list of sources packages that need to be updated (266 packages):
> http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/python/sources-by-maint
Pierre Habouzit (Madcoder) did the mass-bug filing:
http://bugs.debian.org/submitter:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.de
Le Mar 13 Juin 2006 20:38, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> For NMUers, always start by filling a bug report refering to this
> announce, register the bug number and your intent to work on it in
> the wiki page, do the work, send the patch to the BTS and upload the
> package appropriately (using a DELA
Hello!
[Tue, 13 Jun 2006] Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> If you don't have time to do this now, please reply on
> debian-python@lists.debian.org and allow us to make NMU of your packages.
I wont have much time to fix my packages so please feel free to NMU any
of them:
> Robert Jordens <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Marc Dequènes wrote:
> They all are available in unstable now. You can find in my web directory
> 2 examples (soya and editobj), where, besides bugs in pysupport or
> pycentral, are well built using an updated version of the class :
> http://perso.duckcorp.org/duck/python-new
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> Here's a list of sources packages that need to be updated (266 packages):
>> http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/python/sources-by-maint
>
> Pierre Habouzit (Madcoder) did the mass-bug filing:
> http://bugs.debian.org/submitter:
let's imagine we have that case:
python-foo is a python module that uses and needs features from
python2.X. python-bar uses python-foo but can work with all 2.* python
version.
Python-Versions will be:
* >= 2.X for python-foo
* all for python-bar
how do we ensure that a user that has a pytho
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> let's imagine we have that case:
>
> python-foo is a python module that uses and needs features from
> python2.X. python-bar uses python-foo but can work with all 2.* python
> version.
>
> Python-Versions will be:
> * >= 2.X for python-foo
> * all
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> My libgpod package didn't appear in the list because it currently only
> builds an python2.3-gpod and no python-gpod at all. Feel free to NMU
> this package as I really have no idea about that whole python modules
My python2.3-lasso package didn't appear either; I shoul
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 11:55 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Here's a list of sources packages that need to be updated (266 packages):
> > http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/python/sources-by-maint
>
> Pierre Habouzit (Madcoder) did the mass-bug filing
Le mer 14 juin 2006 19:27, Joe Wreschnig a écrit :
> On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 11:55 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > Here's a list of sources packages that need to be updated (266
> > > packages):
> > > http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/python/sources
"Python Transition Mass bug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, your package has been detected as generating a python
> module/extension that may need an upgrade to the new Python Policy[1].
>
> A wiki page [2] explains what has to be done to upgrade your packages
> to the new Policy. This bug
Hello,
can someone please nmu python-orbit to comply with the new python
policy? The bug is #373331. I'm too buzy, and going on vacation now.
If someone want to adopt the package, they are welcome to take it.
--
Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.solfege.org/
GNU Sol
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 at 16:10:48 -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 22:05 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > What about people who want to use pyxpcom with modules that aren't
> > available with the current python ?
>
> But a user couldn't install more than one such module at a time, si
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:43:21PM +0200, Piotr Ozarowski wrote:
> Graham Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > That would happen anyway for new Python releases, plus, my understanding
> > is that with the new Python framework in place, supporting new Python
> > versions can be handled simply by bin NMUs
Graham Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > What if user will change his default python version (f.e. if his scripts
> > will use /usr/bin/env python, or simply he will start his script with
> > pythonX.Y)?
>
> I'm not sure I understand your question. Why would the user change his
> default Python vers
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:45:32PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> that is correct. OTOH, each new upload to unstable may add a new
> dependency on a newly uploaded library having a more strict dependency
> or a new soname. If you build for the version we transition from, and
> for the version we tr
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 11:06:53PM +0200, Piotr Ozarowski wrote:
> He can simply change /usr/bin/python symlink (that's very bad, but
> it's possible)
To be honest, I don't think it's worth supporting that, since the user
is basically breaking his Python install.
> or if he will need some feature
Piotr Ozarowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What if user will change his default python version (f.e. if his
> > > scripts will use /usr/bin/env python, or simply he will start his
> > > script with pythonX.Y)?
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand your question. Why would the user change his
> >
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 06:43:32PM -0600, Jed Frechette wrote:
> This is exactly the situation I am in now. I want to use PyX for
> plotting but I need some of the features in Python 2.4. Well I
> probably don't need them, I am sure I could find work arounds, but why
> should I write code that is m
22 matches
Mail list logo
