On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 08:07:05PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> long time ago, stackless was distributed as a patch to python. is this
> still the case?
They provide full tarballs on the site. what is important to know is
wether it can live in a separate tree for his own files, and use the
com
Ethan Glasser-Camp writes:
> Hi guys,
>
> I asked on #debian-python a few days ago about the odds of Stackless
> being packaged. MadCoder, speaking unofficially, told me that this
> question would be better to ask on this list, and suggested I do some
> research about the compatibility between Sta
Le ven 11 août 2006 19:48, Ethan Glasser-Camp a écrit :
> Hi guys,
>
> I asked on #debian-python a few days ago about the odds of Stackless
> being packaged. MadCoder, speaking unofficially, told me that this
> question would be better to ask on this list, and suggested I do some
> research about t
Hi guys,
I asked on #debian-python a few days ago about the odds of Stackless
being packaged. MadCoder, speaking unofficially, told me that this
question would be better to ask on this list, and suggested I do some
research about the compatibility between Stackless and vanilla
CPython. I went to t
Hello Raphaël,
if you do so - taking over maintenance by python modules team - please
also update the fpconst.py file. The version actually delivered with
python-soappy does not work on 64 bit systems. There is an updated
version available
http://mac.warnes.net/~warnes/files/fpconst-0.7.2.tar.gz
Kumar Appaiah ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Piotr Ozarowski gmail.com> writes:
> > These lines are not needed:
> >
> > find ./doc |xargs chmod 644
> > find -name 'config.xml' | xargs chmod 644
> >
> > dh_fixperms will do the job
>
> Removed.
Hmm... I pasted one line too much - config.xml file is ins
6 matches
Mail list logo
