Le mercredi 21 mars 2007 à 19:13 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> You implemented a tool that *ignored* some of the use cases that went into
> the initial policy, among them the case for 'current'.
This is wrong. Python-support doesn't rely on anything else than what
the maintainer chooses to bui
Twas brillig at 19:13:19 21.03.2007 UTC-07 when Steve Langasek did gyre and
gimble:
SL> You implemented a tool that *ignored* some of the use cases that went into
SL> the initial policy, among them the case for 'current'.
Please, give us a link to the *written* use cases, so we can map them t
* Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-21 21:49:00 +0100]:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:25:52PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> > it's useful for Python applications that need specific Python version.
> >
> > f.e. if current Python version is 2.4 and my app. will work only with
> > python
[Tristan Seligmann, 22.03.2007]
> * Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-21 21:49:00 +0100]:
> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:25:52PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> > > it's useful for Python applications that need specific Python version.
> > >
> > > f.e. if current Python version is 2.4 a
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 01:36:08PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Tristan Seligmann, 22.03.2007]
> > * Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-21 21:49:00 +0100]:
> > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:25:52PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> > > > it's useful for Python applications that need spec
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 04:20:01PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> The fpconst module is packaged within the python-soappy package at the
> moment, which I have adopted with Ed Boraas' agreement. There're a few
> reasons to package the small module as an extra package:
Aaarrrggghhh!
Just these days
Heya,
>
> Just these days I've hijacked the python-soappy package, with the
> agreement of the python-modules team since Ed did not reply to their
> ping a long time ago.
>
> See http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2007/03/msg00042.html.
>
He had replied to me within a few days, I missed to po
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 05:30:54PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2007/03/msg00042.html.
> He had replied to me within a few days, I missed to post it to d-py, though.
Here it is:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2006/07/msg00022.html
Hi discusse
Le jeudi 22 mars 2007 à 14:50 +0100, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> exactly, putting current is just yet-another-place where the
> maintainers declares that he will only prepare the package for "current"
> python. And you're right, python-(all-?)-dev is a already here to give a
> hint to the dh_tool
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 07:50:35PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 22 mars 2007 à 14:50 +0100, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> > exactly, putting current is just yet-another-place where the
> > maintainers declares that he will only prepare the package for "current"
> > python. And you're r
Le jeudi 22 mars 2007 à 19:56 +0100, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> > Just nitpicking: the dh_ tool doesn't need to know that, as it can guess
> > it from what was previously built. This is a hint for the release
> > managers (to know which packages need a binNMU), and could be the base
> > for a scri
[Josselin Mouette, 22.03.2007]
> Le jeudi 22 mars 2007 à 19:56 +0100, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> > > Just nitpicking: the dh_ tool doesn't need to know that, as it can guess
> > > it from what was previously built. This is a hint for the release
> > > managers (to know which packages need a binNMU
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 10:13:40PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Josselin Mouette, 22.03.2007]
> > Le jeudi 22 mars 2007 à 19:56 +0100, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> > > > Just nitpicking: the dh_ tool doesn't need to know that, as it can guess
> > > > it from what was previously built. This is a
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 01:36:08PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Tristan Seligmann, 22.03.2007]
> > * Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-21 21:49:00 +0100]:
> > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:25:52PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> > > > it's useful for Python applications that need spec
14 matches
Mail list logo
