Hey!
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 15:14 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Hi Kov and Bob,
> in the process of packaging Python modules that are needed for
> TurboGears 2, I've stumbled upon the pkg-turbogears alioth project
> [1], which looks like dead: not even turbogears 1 dependencies are
> there a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefano Zacchiroli
* Package name: python-repoze.what-plugins
Version : 20090540
Upstream Author : Various authors
* URL :
http://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=search&term=repoze.what&submit=search
* License : BSD-deriv
Hello, Here is a short presentation of the artist HUON Jam, which I am a career
and just released her new album "Turn your Dreams" available on his Myspace and
blog sites and in a few bins of South Finistère (Brittany). Listen to his
songs and visit his site:
www.myspace.com/jamhuon
And feel f
Jakub Wilk escribió:
> Well, technically Mercurial extensions *are* public Python modules. You
> can import one into your own Python program and fiddle with it. Most
> users would never do such a thing, yet it is perfectly feasible and can
> be proven useful.
Ok, I misunderstood you. I thought hg-
2009/5/29 Jakub Wilk :
> Hello,
>
> What is the correct umbrella to package a plugin for a Python application
> under? DPMT or PAPT?
>
Depends how you package it. If you "inject" it into the app's private
modules folder eg /usr/share/APPLICATION/plugins/ then I
think it is safe to go into PAPT. If
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefano Zacchiroli
* Package name: python-repoze.who-plugins
Version : 20090530
Upstream Author : Various athors
* URL :
http://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=search&term=repoze.who&submit=search
* License : BSD
* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort , 2009-05-30, 01:42:
What is the correct umbrella to package a plugin for a Python
application under? DPMT or PAPT?
PAPT, since it's not a module
And, is there some recommended binary package naming scheme for such
packages?
Nope, there's only one for modules, but t
7 matches
Mail list logo
