Re: [Python-modules-team] numpy 1.6.1 into unstable?

2012-04-10 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello Yaroslav, such questions are better asked on debian-python: few people reads the pkging ml (cc added). On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 22:02, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > sorry if that is obvious from somewhere but I wondered -- what are the > showstoppers preventing numpy 1.6.1 migration from noone-

Re: py.test is not in debian anymore

2012-04-10 Thread Floris Bruynooghe
Hi, On 4 April 2012 15:47, Simon Chopin wrote: > IMHO there is three alternatives: >  * Provide the scripts for all Python versions available, py.test[-3] >    pointing to the default Python version. It would mean that the >    package would depend on python-all and python3-all because of the >  

Re: [Python-modules-team] numpy 1.6.1 into unstable?

2012-04-10 Thread Julian Taylor
On 04/10/2012 10:56 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hello Yaroslav, > such questions are better asked on debian-python: few people reads the > pkging ml (cc added). > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 22:02, Yaroslav Halchenko > wrote: >> sorry if that is obvious from somewhere but I wondered -- what are the >>

Re: RFS: python3-dateutil

2012-04-10 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 5 April 2012 11:38, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Indeed, adding --check-dirname-level=0 fixes the problem for me. I've added that, and checked that it still works for me. Thanks, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Re: [Python-modules-team] numpy 1.6.1 into unstable?

2012-04-10 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 19:30, Julian Taylor wrote: > 640940 [0] and 665998 should probably still be resolved in the upload to > unstable. you didn't seem to have addressed Jakub reply in 640940... > ftw. numpy 1.6 has been uploaded in ubuntu precise three weeks ago and > the world did not fall