Re: please help with a pbuilder error on local debug.

2012-05-04 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 4 May 2012 23:33, Tim Michelsen wrote: > how to solve pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy dependencies? > https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pbuilder/+question/196073 Looking at which packages it says aren't installable, I would guess that your pbuilder environment isn't set up to get pack

Re: please help with a pbuilder error on local debug.

2012-05-04 Thread Tim Michelsen
Hello, I had the same issue again: how to solve pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy dependencies? https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pbuilder/+question/196073 I would appreciate your help here to make the thing flow. Kind regards. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.de

Re: Help in packaging rubber

2012-05-04 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 04.05.12 Andreas Noteng (andr...@noteng.no) wrote: > On 04. mai 2012 12:01, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi, > > Correct. It applies to a preview for a new upload, which is on my PC. > > I just wanted to document, which changes I've applied for the > > dh_pysupport -> dh_python2 migration. > > It's k

Re: RFS: python-unicodecsv (Closes: #669678)

2012-05-04 Thread Thomas Bechtold
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 00:39 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Thomas Bechtold , 2012-04-26, 06:48: > >i fixed all the stuff (see comments below) and uploaded a new package > >to mentors.debian.net . if there are no other issues, i'll add the > >debian-dir to the python-modules svn > > Please feel fre

Re: Packaging python-mocker and cloud-init in Debian ?

2012-05-04 Thread Scott Moser
On Fri, 4 May 2012, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:24:34AM -0400, Scott Moser a écrit : > > > > My goal would be to keep minimal changes from debian to ubuntu, and the > > code there does not cause any issues that i'm aware of if there is no > > readahead installed. Is there s

Re: Double build failures

2012-05-04 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Fri, 04 May 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Yaroslav Halchenko , 2012-05-04, 13:29: > >>>Most of the time, the failures are because of the created egg > >>>directory that is not cleaned up by the clean target of > >>>setup.py. While I could add the appropriate bits to each clean > >>>target in deb

Re: Double build failures

2012-05-04 Thread Barry Warsaw
On May 04, 2012, at 07:16 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: >On 4 May 2012 19:06, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: >> ok. what is the relationship between 'distribute' & 'packaging'? > >Let's see if I get all these right: > >distutils: basic packaging functionality, part of the Python standard library >setuptools

Re: Double build failures

2012-05-04 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 4 May 2012 19:06, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > ok. what is the relationship between 'distribute' & 'packaging'? Let's see if I get all these right: distutils: basic packaging functionality, part of the Python standard library setuptools: third party module to add functionality that distutils lac

Re: Double build failures

2012-05-04 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 04/05/12 19:04, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Friday, May 04, 2012 06:38:30 PM Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: >> On 04/05/12 18:23, Sandro Tosi wrote: >>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > or in setuptools. Ideally, by burning it with fire. >>> >>> CPython upstreams are d

Re: Double build failures

2012-05-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, May 04, 2012 06:38:30 PM Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > On 04/05/12 18:23, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > >>> or in setuptools. > >> > >> Ideally, by burning it with fire. > > > > CPython upstreams are developing a new module to replace distutils

Re: Double build failures

2012-05-04 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Yaroslav Halchenko , 2012-05-04, 13:29: Most of the time, the failures are because of the created egg directory that is not cleaned up by the clean target of setup.py. While I could add the appropriate bits to each clean target in debian/rules, it seems better to fix the problem either in dh_

Re: Double build failures

2012-05-04 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 04/05/12 18:23, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: >>> or in setuptools. >> >> Ideally, by burning it with fire. > > CPython upstreams are developing a new module to replace distutils and > setuptools: packaging. It might be worth check with them if it will

Re: Double build failures

2012-05-04 Thread Éric Araujo
Hi list, Le 04/05/2012 13:23, Sandro Tosi a écrit : CPython upstreams are developing a new module to replace distutils and setuptools: packaging. It might be worth check with them if it will handle this case. Can you explain what the problem is? (I never packaged something that uses setuptoo

Re: Double build failures

2012-05-04 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Fri, 04 May 2012, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > > Most of the time, the failures are because of the created egg directory > > that is not cleaned up by the clean target of setup.py. While I could > > add the appropriate bits to each clean target in debian/rules, it seems > > better to fix the

Re: Double build failures

2012-05-04 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: >> or in setuptools. > > Ideally, by burning it with fire. CPython upstreams are developing a new module to replace distutils and setuptools: packaging. It might be worth check with them if it will handle this case. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka

Re: Double build failures

2012-05-04 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Vincent Bernat , 2012-05-04, 19:05: I got some bug reports from Jakub about double build failures. I have always found those kind of tests a bit silly, but that's just my opinion. Most of the time, the failures are because of the created egg directory that is not cleaned up by the clean tar

Re: Double build failures

2012-05-04 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 04/05/12 18:05, Vincent Bernat wrote: > Hi! > > I got some bug reports from Jakub about double build failures. I have > always found those kind of tests a bit silly, but that's just my > opinion. > > Most of the time, the failures are because of the created egg directory > that is

Double build failures

2012-05-04 Thread Vincent Bernat
Hi! I got some bug reports from Jakub about double build failures. I have always found those kind of tests a bit silly, but that's just my opinion. Most of the time, the failures are because of the created egg directory that is not cleaned up by the clean target of setup.py. While

Re: Help in packaging rubber

2012-05-04 Thread Andreas Noteng
On 04. mai 2012 12:01, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Correct. It applies to a preview for a new upload, which is on my PC. > I just wanted to document, which changes I've applied for the > dh_pysupport -> dh_python2 migration. It's kind of hard to say without seeing the whole package, but if you get it in

Re: Help in packaging rubber

2012-05-04 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 03.05.12 Andreas Noteng (andr...@noteng.no) wrote: > On 03. mai 2012 22:54, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi, > > Attached is the patch documenting the changes I've applied. Is this > > OK? > > The patch does not seem to apply to the revision currently in Debian. > Correct. It applies to a preview f

Re: Help in packaging rubber

2012-05-04 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Olivier Sallou , 2012-05-04, 09:19: Yes, I've read http://deb.li/dhs2p, but I'm failing to understand what I have to do in the "Before you begin" section. Unfortunately I don't speak python myself, this might be the reason. In the Before you begin, they ask you to check there is no existing p

Re: Help in packaging rubber

2012-05-04 Thread Olivier Sallou
Le 5/3/12 9:16 PM, Jakub Wilk a écrit : > * Olivier Sallou , 2012-05-03, 08:06: >>> Yes, I've read http://deb.li/dhs2p, but I'm failing to understand >>> what I have to do in the "Before you begin" section. Unfortunately I >>> don't speak python myself, this might be the reason. >> In the Before