Hi guys,
it's been two months since I initially posted this RFS, and the release
is getting nearer...
Regards, Thibaut.
Le 26/05/12 11:05, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
> Le 08/05/12 09:43, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
>> Hi guys,
>
>> I'd love it if someone could have a look at this package:
>> http
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.)
* Denis Laxalde , 2012-06-11, 20:51:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/numpydoc/numpydoc_0.4-1.dsc
Minor nitpick: I'd use "debhelper (>= 8)" instead of "debhelper (>=
8.0.0)" in Build-Depends. (Sorry, it's my pet peeve!)
Upstrea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Taking this off mentors.
On 06/11/2012 12:12 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> The dependencies are generated by dh_python{2,3}, so it's a matter
> of fixing shebangs before they are called, isn't it?
>
> This may help:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-pytho
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Policy-compliant package name would be "python-numpydoc", but that
> could be easily confused with "python-numpy-doc". So I agree with
> your assessment: "python-numpydoc-sphinx" is a better for the binary
> package.
if it wouldn't be "convention compliant
Jakub Wilk wrote:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/numpydoc/numpydoc_0.4-1.dsc
Minor nitpick: I'd use "debhelper (>= 8)" instead of "debhelper (>=
8.0.0)" in Build-Depends. (Sorry, it's my pet peeve!)
Upstream provides some tests, please run the at build time.
Done. Men
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Policy-compliant package name would be "python-numpydoc", but that
could be easily confused with "python-numpy-doc". So I agree with
your assessment: "python-numpydoc-sphinx" is a better for the binary
package.
if it wouldn't be "convention compliant" anyways -- may be
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 02:13:14 PM nore...@alioth.debian.org wrote:
> I would like to join the python-apps team for the following reasons.
>
> * short term: take care of pdfposter, update it to version 0.5.0, try to
> close the existing bugs. * mid term: if the Maintainer of pdfposter
> continu
On 2012-06-12 at 10:24:16 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 02:13:14 PM nore...@alioth.debian.org wrote:
> > I believe I already have access to the svn repo, since I have access to the
> > python-modules one where I maintain python-gnupg.
it seems I was too quick to assume
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> >>Policy-compliant package name would be "python-numpydoc", but that
> >>could be easily confused with "python-numpy-doc". So I agree with
> >>your assessment: "python-numpydoc-sphinx" is a better for the binary
> >>package.
> >if it wouldn't be "conven
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
>On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Denis Laxalde wrote:
>> >>Policy-compliant package name would be "python-numpydoc", but that
>> >>could be easily confused with "python-numpy-doc". So I agree with
>> >>your assessment: "python-numpydoc-sphinx" is a better for the
>binary
>> >>p
10 matches
Mail list logo
