Bug#856637: ITP: python-django-push-notifications -- Send push notifications through GCM or APNS in Django

2017-03-03 Thread Michael Fladischer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Fladischer -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: python-django-push-notifications Version : 1.4.1 Upstream Author : Jerome Leclanche * URL : https://github.com/jleclanche/django-push-notificati

Re: Backport of python-lockfile and suggested team maintenance

2017-03-03 Thread Ben Finney
Andreas Tille writes: > I would have loved to commit the changes to some team Git repository > but you are using a repository outside git.debian.org. Fortunately, Git is a distributed VCS; we can share changes between repositories with all information preserved. If you also publish your reposit

Re: Adopting OpenStack packages

2017-03-03 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 02/28/2017 09:46 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > We've talked on various lists about adopting the OpenStack packages into DPMT, > and also adopting the team's standard workflows and helpers. > > The way the packages have been maintained in the past isn't aligned with our > team practices, but Allison

Re: Backport of python-lockfile and suggested team maintenance

2017-03-03 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/02/2017 10:52 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Ben, > > I just uploaded python-lockfile 0.12.2-2~bpo8+1 to backports since I > need it to backport python-schema-salad. > > I would have loved to commit the changes to some team Git repository but > you are using a repository outside git.debian.o

Re: Backport of python-lockfile and suggested team maintenance

2017-03-03 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 03, 2017, at 02:03 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >Please consider that python-lockfile is considered deprecated upstream, >and only maintained for bugs and security. There's alternative >available, like python-oslo.concurrency. ObPlug: Or flufl.lock, albeit with a different API and other (some

Re: Adopting OpenStack packages

2017-03-03 Thread Allison Randal
On 03/03/2017 08:01 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Could you please put this on hold? It's possible that I resume my work > on OpenStack packages (though I can't disclose anything on this yet). Hi Thomas, I appreciate your preferences, I really do. But the past few months have been a pretty harsh re

Re: Adopting OpenStack packages

2017-03-03 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/03/2017 04:09 PM, Allison Randal wrote: > On 03/03/2017 08:01 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Could you please put this on hold? It's possible that I resume my work >> on OpenStack packages (though I can't disclose anything on this yet). > > Hi Thomas, > > I appreciate your preferences, I real

Re: Adopting OpenStack packages

2017-03-03 Thread Brian May
Thomas Goirand writes: > And I'm not even addressing yet the horrible git-dpm troubles, how > many more years the team is forcibly burying every contributor into. There is discussion on changing this. The consensus seems to be we should wait until after the next release however. > Plus Alioth i

Re: Adopting OpenStack packages

2017-03-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 3, 2017 10:37:16 PM EST, Thomas Goirand wrote: ... >4/ Finally, I feel very much unwelcome by the team "leaders" of the >DPMT >(of which the "main" person happen to also be that SQLA maintainer >which >I prefer not to name). I already have, and will continue to avoid -as >much as possib

Re: Adopting OpenStack packages

2017-03-03 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2017-03-04 04:37:16 +0100: > On 03/03/2017 04:09 PM, Allison Randal wrote: > > On 03/03/2017 08:01 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> Could you please put this on hold? It's possible that I resume my work > >> on OpenStack packages (though I can't disclose anyt