Hi,
for the new version of python-pyvcf[1] I get
W: python3-pyvcf: python-module-in-wrong-location
usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/vcf/ usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/vcf/
W: python3-pyvcf: python-module-in-wrong-location
usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/vcf/parser.py
usr/lib/python3/dist-packag
Hi Frederic,
Am Freitag, den 03.08.2018, 13:28 + schrieb PICCA Frederic-
Emmanuel:
> Hello, I need to create a new package for
>
> spyder_kernels.
>
> Is there a tool which allows to create the first version of a package
> which create the debian/directory from the setup.py files ?
There i
no problem Ghislain, I am on it :))
Cheers
Fred
https://packages.debian.org/unstable/pypi2deb
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 9:45 AM PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
wrote:
>
> Hello, I need to create a new package for
>
> spyder_kernels.
>
> Is there a tool which allows to create the first version of a package which
> create the debian/directory from the setu
Hi Fred,
You can probably use one of the packaging for one of the Spyder plugins as
the basis for src:spyder-kernels.
Otherwise, I can do it if you prefer?
Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 14:45, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <
frederic-emmanuel.pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr> a écrit :
> Hello, I need to create a
Hello, I need to create a new package for
spyder_kernels.
Is there a tool which allows to create the first version of a package which
create the debian/directory from the setup.py files ?
thanks
Frederic
> 1. convert git-dpm -> gbp
thanks for doing this!
> 2. change default branch to debian/master
please dont. a quick check to the perl team and it seems they dont
require it, so should we? if someone wants to follow DEP-14 then just
do so and document it on debian/README.source (and repoint HEAD)
On 2018-08-03 10:08, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2018-08-03 08:04, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > There is no upstream/master, upstream/unstable, upstream/stretch or
> > similar in DEP-14, because:
>
> I did not suggest mingling upstream branches with Debian
> versions, which seems to be your impress
On 2018-08-03 08:04, Simon McVittie wrote:
> There is no upstream/master, upstream/unstable, upstream/stretch or
> similar in DEP-14, because:
I did not suggest mingling upstream branches with Debian
versions, which seems to be your impression. I just (maybe
wrongly) thought, that upstream/master
On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 at 08:21:28 +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> In fact, I thought that "upstream/master" were DEP-14-ish, but
> only "upstream/latest" (for the newest release) is.
Yes. The simple case for DEP-14 is that you are only following one
upstream branch, which is upstream/latest; the m
10 matches
Mail list logo