On 9/14/21 8:36 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 9/13/21 4:02 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
>> On Fri, 3 Sep 2021, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>
Python 3.8 upstream now has a common ABI for normal and debug extension
builds,
so it is technically possible to load a debug extension in the normal
Hello,
this is about the "xlsxwriter" package [1] and this one year old bug
report about defect "homepage" url [2].
I am new in the neighborhood and think this is a good issue to learn
something about the Debian internals.
So where does the "homepage" url in the "link" box on the right side of
t
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:58:24 +
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is about the "xlsxwriter" package [1] and this one year old bug
> report about defect "homepage" url [2].
>
> I am new in the neighborhood and think this is a good issue to learn
> something about the Debian internals.
>
> So where do
On 2021-09-15 15:46, Neil Williams wrote:
> https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/x/xlsxwriter/control-1.1.2-0.2
>
> The package does not seem to have a current version control repository.
>
> That would be a good start. There doesn't seem to be a project in
> salsa.debian.org and it would m
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021, Andrius Merkys wrote:
https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/x/xlsxwriter/control-1.1.2-0.2
The package does not seem to have a current version control repository.
That would be a good start. There doesn't seem to be a project in
salsa.debian.org and it would make thing
> Now filed as
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pydbg-removal;users=debian-python@lists.debian.org
why "Severity: serious"? none of them violates the policy:
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities; please adjust to
normal or important. thanks
--
Sandro "morph" Tosi
M
Thanks for the reply's.
On 2021-09-15 09:02 Scott Talbert wrote:
> It seems that this package should probably be fully moved and adopted
> into the Debian Python Team - it seems to have been partially done.
I would say the salsa project is outdated because the version number
in setup.py does not
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
It seems that this package should probably be fully moved and adopted
into the Debian Python Team - it seems to have been partially done.
I would say the salsa project is outdated because the version number
in setup.py does not fit to upstream.
ht
Dear Scott
On 2021-09-15 10:59 Scott Talbert wrote:
> so that would need to be sorted out.
This sounds like a task that should be taken by someone more
experienced then me.
Hello everybody,
> This sounds like a task that should be taken by someone more
> experienced then me.
Looking in the salsa repo [0], it is very old. And that shouldn't happen. I
can updated
to the last unstable version tonight/tomorrow. If There's no objections.
Or, perhaps
Christian (the initia
As mentioned in debian-devel recently [1], at the DebConf 21 Debian
Python BoF [2] we discussed the idea of reverting our unbundling patches
to python-pip. The group consensus was that it wasn't worth the effort
to maintain these patches.
Debian Security Team and my co-maintainers: Do you have an
11 matches
Mail list logo
