Hi Sandro,
Thanks for your reply!
Sandro Tosi wrote on 28.09.21 19:00:
This package repository is hosted on the Debian Python Team salsa
group, at https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/sentry-python
while you're proposing an upload outside of this setup via Mentors.
It's usually inappr
Hi,
in the issue I filed against nipype I was asked to try to rebuild numpy
and see whether this might make a diffence. So I tried
dget http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/n/numpy/numpy_1.19.5-1.dsc
cd numpy-1.19.5
and have rebuild it in a recent pbuilder environment. This ends up in
D
Please do report bugs in the BTS when there's a problem with a package
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:32 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> in the issue I filed against nipype I was asked to try to rebuild numpy
> and see whether this might make a diffence. So I tried
>
> dget http://deb.debian.o
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 11:27:23AM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Please do report bugs in the BTS when there's a problem with a package
#995318
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Hi,
> Could someone please upload this little package ? It's a dependency of
> xsdata, an awesome XML/dataclasses library I'd like to get into the archive.
uploaded, thanks for your contribution!
One note: I'd consider watching for PyPI instead of GitHub.
Cheers,
Nik
Hi,
I would like to reintroduce foolscap [1] which is part of DPT back to
unstable as it is a dependency for reintroducing tahoe-lafs which I used
to maintain earlier in Debian.
Salsa login: vasudev
I've gone through
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/policy.
> One note: I'd consider watching for PyPI instead of GitHub.
there was actually a recent discussion on this list, discouraging from
using PyPI in favor of github, since GH tarball usually contains docs,
tests, and other files useful when building from source, usually not
included in tarball relea
> there was actually a recent discussion on this list, discouraging from
> using PyPI in favor of github, since GH tarball usually contains docs,
> tests, and other files useful when building from source, usually not
> included in tarball released to users, ie pypi
That's an upstream bug then, a
On 2021-09-29 16:32:05 -0400 (-0400), Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > One note: I'd consider watching for PyPI instead of GitHub.
>
> there was actually a recent discussion on this list, discouraging
> from using PyPI in favor of github, since GH tarball usually
> contains docs, tests, and other files usef
> That's an upstream bug then, and upstream should fix that and ship a complete
> source tarball.
>
> I always submit pull requests updating MANIFEST.in and until now, all
> upstreams have accepted them.
and that will require an upstream new release, which does not help
when you want/need to pac
> and that will require an upstream new release, which does not help
> when you want/need to package the current one
Most upstreams kindly make . post releases immediately.
Maybe I am just lucky with upstreams...
-nik
Le mer. 29 sept. 2021 à 23:14, Dominik George a
écrit :
>
> > and that will require an upstream new release, which does not help
> > when you want/need to package the current one
>
> Most upstreams kindly make . post releases immediately.
>
I found that to be pretty rare in my own experience.
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
