On 12/22/22 02:21, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
100% +1 I'm especially concerned about how a clear plan was not
communicated to other teams--whose work will be broken by the proposed
transition, were an exception to be granted.
Debian is not a paragon of community if it makes late, unannounced
hi Dean,
thanks for making all those improvements. Only a couple of things
remaining:
* Copyright: try using standard license shortnames [1] where
possible: Easing appears identical to BSD-3-clause; Khronos looks
a lot like Expat.
* Rules, lintian: are the files in
The first time I had cases with binary multiples, I was a bit lost. But later,
with the help of the staff, I managed to pack,
I don't know if this is the same case as yours, but if so, you can follow this
example here:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sphinx-multiversion
Hi Bo (2022.12.26_07:01:29_+)
> W: python3-xdoctest: no-manual-page [usr/bin/xdoctest]
Yeah, applications *should* have manual pages, but it's not required. If
you need more tooling to build the manpage, it can wait until those
tools are available in Debian.
> P: xdoctest source:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 3:01 PM Bo YU wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am packaging the xdoctest to meet ubelt's[0] B-D.
>
> Now I think it has a good shape in packaging[1], but I am not sure
> about below warning:
>
> ```
> W: python3-xdoctest: no-manual-page [usr/bin/xdoctest]
> P: xdoctest source:
5 matches
Mail list logo
