Re: Helping hands needed to upgrade scipy

Hi Drew, Am Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 02:45:31AM +0100 schrieb Drew Parsons: > On 2023-01-17 18:12, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I upgraded the experimental branch of scipy to contain the submodules > > upstream includes. I'm *not* convinced that we need them all - > > hopefully we can get ri

Re: Helping hands needed to upgrade scipy

On 2023-01-17 18:12, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, I upgraded the experimental branch of scipy to contain the submodules upstream includes. I'm *not* convinced that we need them all - hopefully we can get rid of boost (but upstream has some patches here) and scipy-mathjax. For the moment I've tried

Re: Old generated binary dependencies after renaming psycopg

On January 17, 2023 11:01:45 PM UTC, Tomasz Rybak wrote: >On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 09:20 +, Julian Gilbey wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 09:08:01AM +0100, Tomasz Rybak wrote: >> > Hello. >> > After fixing #1016031 "psycopg3: binary package name should be python3- >> > psycopg" >> > (I renam

Re: Old generated binary dependencies after renaming psycopg

On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 09:20 +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 09:08:01AM +0100, Tomasz Rybak wrote: > > Hello. > > After fixing #1016031 "psycopg3: binary package name should be python3- > > psycopg" > > (I renamed package names, full changes: > > * python3-psycopg3 -> python3-p

Re: twitterwatch - upload needed

Hi, On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 6:16 PM Malik wrote: > Hello Emmanuel, > > currently upstream-author has no plan to update or release any further > releases for this project [1] > Ok > > > [1] https://gitlab.com/chaica/twitterwatch/-/issues/1 > > kind regards, > Malik > If you leave the package a

Re: How to create multi-source tarball with different submodules for scipy

On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 16:06, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi, > > I tried to create a multi-source tarball for scipy in its experimental > branch[1]. Upstream includes a set of git submodules in its build > process. I intended to merge all these submodules in a single > scipy_1.10.0.orig-submodules

Re: twitterwatch - upload needed

Hello Emmanuel, currently upstream-author has no plan to update or release any further releases for this project [1] [1] https://gitlab.com/chaica/twitterwatch/-/issues/1 kind regards, Malik Am So., 15. Jan. 2023 um 13:28 Uhr schrieb Emmanuel Arias < eam...@yaerobi.com>: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan

Re: Help for python-pynndescent needed

Hi Malik, Am Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 07:53:32PM +0100 schrieb Malik: > did you tried to run those tests with a lower python version, you are > running tests with 3.10 [1]: > > = test session starts > == > platform linux -- Python 3.10.9, pytest

Re: Help for python-pynndescent needed

Hey Andreas, did you tried to run those tests with a lower python version, you are running tests with 3.10 [1]: = test session starts == platform linux -- Python 3.10.9, pytest-7.2.1, pluggy-1.0.0+repack -- /usr/bin/python3.10 and the upstr

Re: Helping hands needed to upgrade scipy

Hi Andreas, I am an upstream author of software packages (fabio & pyFAI) which took the same build system as scipy (meson-python) and I can confirm you there are issues with the debian packaging: * finding cython (apparently it should be fixed upstream in meson) * choose the proper python: sid ha

Help for python-pynndescent needed

Hi, any idea why the build-time test of python-pynndescent fails[1]? Any help would be welcome. Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-pynndescent/-/jobs/3811021 -- http://fam-tille.de

Helping hands needed to upgrade scipy

Hi, I upgraded the experimental branch of scipy to contain the submodules upstream includes. I'm *not* convinced that we need them all - hopefully we can get rid of boost (but upstream has some patches here) and scipy-mathjax. For the moment I've tried to build the experimental branch and ended

Re: How to create multi-source tarball with different submodules for scipy

Am Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 08:55:21AM +0800 schrieb Paul Wise: > On Mon, 2023-01-16 at 17:05 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > I intended to merge all these submodules in a single > > scipy_1.10.0.orig-submodules.tar.gz. > Any reason not to use one tarball per submodule? Yes, this would need manual

Bug#1029076: uwsgi-plugin-python3: built against non-default libpython3.11 / should always build against the defalt Python in testing

Package: uwsgi-plugin-python3 Version: 2.0.21-3+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Currently, the uWSGI Python 3 plugin is built against Python 3.11, and depends on libpython3.11.

Re: Old generated binary dependencies after renaming psycopg

On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 09:08:01AM +0100, Tomasz Rybak wrote: > Hello. > After fixing #1016031 "psycopg3: binary package name should be python3- > psycopg" > (I renamed package names, full changes: > * python3-psycopg3 -> python3-psycopg > * python3-psycopg3-pool -> python3-psycopg-pool > * python-

Old generated binary dependencies after renaming psycopg

Hello. After fixing #1016031 "psycopg3: binary package name should be python3- psycopg" (I renamed package names, full changes: * python3-psycopg3 -> python3-psycopg * python3-psycopg3-pool -> python3-psycopg-pool * python-psycopg3-doc -> python3-psycopg-doc) I tried to rebuild reverse dependencies