Heya,
On 6 December 2013 09:49, Olе Streicher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am the maintainer of the astropy package [1], and there the topic was
> brought up what to do with header files for the C API [2]. The package
> provides a C API for one sub-package, astropy.wcs. In the moment, its
> header files ar
On 13 November 2013 19:42, Tim Michelsen wrote:
>> Either don't use pybuild at clean stage with launchpad recipes,
> How do I disable pybuild cleaning?
>
Please address your packaging questions to mailing list, either where
this thread started.
Or on debian mentors.
If one is using dh(1), one sh
On 12 November 2013 22:54, Tim Michelsen wrote:
>> This one is not use pybuild at clean, but rather python_distutils
>>
>> "dh clean --buildsystem=python_distutils"
> OK, but where can I find an example on how to configure the
> corresponding pybuild-based rule correctly?
>
> Sorry, I am lost here
On 12 November 2013 21:56, Tim Michelsen wrote:
multiple other packages? I recommend pybuild for sanity.
>>> OK, I followed that style guie but still get failures in the build:
>>>
>>> dpkg-source -i -I --before-build recipe-1.0.1~ppa7~revno-{revno}
>>
>> oh, paths with "{foo}" will not work
On 29 October 2013 02:22, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The Debian Python Policy documents [1] the rtupdate script for dealing with
> default runtime changes. Is this documentation still valid? Will rtupdate be
> used when the default runtime changes to python 3 or later?
>
python3.X ser
Hello,
On 21 September 2013 05:02, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having issues with backporting pyflakes 0.7.3-1 to Ubuntu precise.
> It would help a lot if you reverted your switch to dh-python. Do you
> think that's possible?
>
No, I will not revert that. Instead dh-python should be back
On 2 August 2013 14:15, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> dh-python is already in unstable \o/
>
> To build/install python3-foo or pypy-foo binary packages,
> you can use this in debian/rules:
>
> %:
> dh $@ --with python2,python3,pypy --buildsystem=pybuild
>
> or if you don't want
On 28 August 2013 21:15, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Aug 02, 2013, at 05:42 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>
>>[Barry Warsaw, 2013-08-02]
>>> On Aug 02, 2013, at 03:15 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>>> >export PYBUILD_DESTDIR_python2=debian/python-foo/
>>> >export PYBUILD_DESTDIR_python2-dbg=debian/
On 22 August 2013 16:25, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I plan to file an ITP to package the 'q' library:
>
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/q/2.4
>
> 'q' seems like a terrible source package name, so I'll probably pick
> 'python-q' as the spn. Obviously we'll have python-q and python3-q[*] binary
> package
On 2 August 2013 14:15, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> dh-python is already in unstable \o/
>
> To build/install python3-foo or pypy-foo binary packages,
> you can use this in debian/rules:
>
> %:
> dh $@ --with python2,python3,pypy --buildsystem=pybuild
>
Shouldn't it be soon..
On 13 June 2013 07:01, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 03:13:38 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 12:48:45 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> > On Thursday, June 06, 2013 12:46:05 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> More updates and added all the "unknown" packages f
On 24 May 2013 20:40, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On May 24, 2013, at 02:55 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> py3flakes - What I don't like about that is that it's harder to locate(1).
>
I like pyflakes3, but better yet I'd prefer:
python3 -m flakes
similar to how compileall / unittest / et al work.
Regard
On 6 May 2013 00:29, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello,
> has this been discussed *and* agreed on? I can only see Luca's mail
> for python plans, but no ack from other "members of the debian python
> board" nor the ACK from RT.
>
Python2.6 security support ends in October 2013 upstream. Which is
well ah
On 23 March 2013 12:37, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Dmitry Shachnev , 2013-03-23, 15:51:
>
>>> I use svn.d.o everywhere, I don't like the new ones. However, the thing I
>>> don't like much more is inconsistency: some packages use svn.d.o, some
>>> anonscm.d.o, and some mixture of the two... Ugh. I don't
On 14 March 2013 13:56, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We discussed new lintian vcs-field-not-canonical check in IRC last week,
> which affects *lots* of packages in our SVN (see [¹]). Now people are
> recommended to use `svn://anonscm.debian.org/*` URIs instead of
> `svn://svn.debian.org/*`, bu
On 25 February 2013 20:29, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 25 February 2013 19:03, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>> hey, can you stop committing huge changes without asking to uploaders
>>> first? I've already contac
>> 9455)
>> +++ packages/pyflakes/trunk/debian/changelog 2013-02-25 18:20:53 UTC (rev
>> 9456)
>> @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
>> +pyflakes (0.6.1-1~exp1ubuntu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
>> +
>> + * Add python3 package / module.
>>
On 19 February 2013 23:49, Ludovic Gasc wrote:
>
> On Feb 19, 2013 11:21 PM, "Barry Warsaw" wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 19, 2013, at 09:42 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
>>
>
> I can do that this week-end. I've only a github account to publish the git
> repository, unless somebody else has an access for a bet
On 16 February 2013 21:35, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 17 February 2013 08:29, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 16 February 2013 14:27, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>>> * Scott Kitterman , 2013-02-16, 09:10:
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, February 16, 2013 12:43:02 PM Thoma
On 16 February 2013 14:27, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Scott Kitterman , 2013-02-16, 09:10:
>>
>> On Saturday, February 16, 2013 12:43:02 PM Thomas Kluyver wrote:
>>>
>>> The following four positions have all been advocated in this thread:
>>>
>>> A - Maintain the status quo, in which DPMT packages may
On 16 February 2013 18:10, Simon Chopin wrote:
> Hello Joseph,
>
> Quoting Joseph Tate (2013-01-30 05:27:08)
>> I've updated the version of pytest to the latest upstream. It doesn't need
>> to be backported, I would just like to see the version in raring be updated.
>>
>> *** /tmp/tmpKV7SC6/bug_
Dear All,
Full article:
http://pyfound.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/python-trademark-at-risk-in-europe-we.html
There is a company in the UK that is trying to trademark the use of
the term "Python" for all software, services, servers... pretty much
anything having to do with a computer. Specifically, i
On 12 February 2013 15:08, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> ...
>> So I wonder, how is the python module packaging policy? Since this
>> module is marked as team maintained, and that I've been accepted in the
>> python module packag
On 10 February 2013 16:54, Matthias Klose wrote:
> There are 126 source packages needing updates. The list of packages
> and maintainers is attached below. I'll file bug reports later (user:
> d...@debian.org, tag: pillow).
>
I see that a few packages were identified to work out of the box by
fed
On 5 February 2013 17:48, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> There's been a lot of discussion lately on various forums (e.g. catalog-sig)
> about PyPI security. I realized that our recommendation for setting
> http_proxy in debian/rules can have beneficial local security implications.
>
> More details here:
>
On 22 December 2012 23:27, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2012, at 05:19 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>
>>Yeah, please don't use virtualenv, as much as I'd like to see a good way
>>of using virtualenv in Debian.
>
> Can you expand on that? It should be usable to develop code, but do you mean
> s
On 18 December 2012 15:48, Paul Wise wrote:
> Seems like a lot of effort when there is no /usr/bin//python
> so there can be only one arch of python installed anyway. What are the
> use-cases for python multiarch?
>
cross-compiling the archive / cross-bootstrapping the archive for a
new architect
On 14 November 2012 19:11, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Barry Warsaw , 2012-11-14, 13:17:
>
While working on the python3-sympy package, I've seen that if Python 2
is installed, various dh_* commands, like dh_auto_clean, will automatically
try to run setup.py in Python 2. In this case, setu
On 6 November 2012 14:09, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> On 6 November 2012 13:58, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
>>
>> It won't be _automatically_ synced, but you can file a sync request:
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess.
>>
>> Or Dmitrijs will sync it for you :)
>
>
> Great, thanks Dmitry.
>
> Dm
On 6 November 2012 12:55, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> On 6 November 2012 12:54, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>>
>> Looks good. Commit and I will sponsor your package.
>
>
> Done. Thanks, Dmitrijs.
>
I am thinking to upload to experimental instead of unstable. It's a
On 6 November 2012 12:36, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> On 6 November 2012 12:03, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>>
>> Can you add an autopkgtest that runs the upstream testsuite?
>
>
> I've had a go - can you have a glance at the attached patch? If it looks OK,
> I'll c
On 6 November 2012 11:14, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to request a sponsor to upload a new version of pyxdg. This is
> essentially the same as an earlier RFS for 0.23-1, but with a new upstream
> version.
>
Can you add an autopkgtest that runs the upstream testsuite?
Regards,
Dm
On 10 October 2012 16:22, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Oct 9, 2012, at 4:48 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>
>> * Hans-Christoph Steiner , 2012-10-08, 20:14:
>>> I'm a DD that is working on a couple python module packages. I have
>>> 'pyjavaproperties' already in wheezy/unstable and python-pure-o
On 02/10/12 17:57, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:59:32AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Oct 02, 2012, at 02:42 PM, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
>>
>>> As far as I know, pylint already runs with Python3. Doesn't it?
>>
>> pyflakes is the one we want to port.
>
> May I ask why ?
>
On 3 September 2012 21:27, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> Hi Nigel,
>
> On 3 September 2012 14:57, Nigel Sedgwick wrote:
>> The application makes heavy use of numpy and wx and will soon make heavy
>> use of scipy, matplotlib and various other python libraries that are
>> widely used.
>
> Python 3 versio
On 04/05/12 19:04, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, May 04, 2012 06:38:30 PM Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 04/05/12 18:23, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>>>>> or in setuptools.
>>>>
>>>> Ideall
On 04/05/12 18:23, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>>> or in setuptools.
>>
>> Ideally, by burning it with fire.
>
> CPython upstreams are developing a new module to replace distutils and
> setuptools: packaging. It might be worth check with them if it will
On 04/05/12 18:05, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I got some bug reports from Jakub about double build failures. I have
> always found those kind of tests a bit silly, but that's just my
> opinion.
>
> Most of the time, the failures are because of the created egg directory
> that is
llow
> your software to also work on Debian stable, as well as some other major
> releases of other distributions.
>
Unless import from future was used extensively
--
With best regards
Dmitrijs Ledkovs (for short Dima),
Ледков Дмитрий Юрьевич
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html
2009/12/9 Loïc Minier :
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> Where is this git repository hosted? Or where can I get the current
>> version of the policy as seen on the debian.org website?
>
> Concerning the Python Policy, it's currently not handled in
of changes and avoid
> flames as much as possible, but now we'd like the whole Debian Python
> community to send comments, feedback, or additional patches.
>
Where is this git repository hosted? Or where can I get the current
version of the policy as seen on the debian.org website?
ipped package by debian? That is my wild guess.
Or maybe contact sphinx maintainer in Debian. I hope there is an
option to symlink it.
>
> --
> Sandro Dentella *:-)
> http://sqlkit.argolinux.org SQLkit home page - PyGTK/python/sqlalchemy
>
--
With best regards
Dmitrijs Ledkovs (for short Dima),
Ледков Дмитрий Юрьевич
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
; --
> Sandro Dentella *:-)
> http://sqlkit.argolinux.org SQLkit home page - PyGTK/python/sqlalchemy
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
>
>
--
With best regards
Dmitrijs Ledkovs (for short Dima),
Ледков Дмитрий Юрьевич
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
pristine-tar support and abandoned
hg-buildpackage. Anyone willing to start working on this drawback
together with me? I have a little bit of ugly hackish code. =)
--
With best regards
Dmitrijs Ledkovs (for short Dima),
Ледков Дмитрий Юрьевич
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ
ink it is safe to go into PAPT. If you install/package it as a
public module than it has to go into DPMT.
--
With best regards
Dmitrijs Ledkovs (for short Dima),
Ледков Дмитрий Юрьевич
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
ill be rejected immediately. Vladimir, can you start with this? Igor, you
>> probably want to have this file in your source package as well.
>
> Okay, I will begin this "bureaucratic work".
>
>
$ licensecheck -r .
note the dot above
and
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/
s the default python
interpreter which points to one of the supported version and by
default it points (symlink) to python2.5 in lenny (I think). the
pythonX.Y are actually real binaries.
If you are not convineced I gues you should
$apt-get source python
and study the packaging.
--
With best r
2009/2/16 Sandro Tosi :
>
> you'd be welcome to so do :) You can find some documentation at [1]
> [2] [3], and feel free to ask d-pyt...@l.d.o for clarification or, if
> you hang around irc, we're on #debian-python at irc.debian.org.
>
> [1] http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonAppsPackagingTeam
> [2
48 matches
Mail list logo
