Hi
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 at 06:00, Diane Trout wrote:
> Upstream mostly supports amd64 and arm64, with unofficial support for
> ppcle64.
>
> https://numba.readthedocs.io/en/stable/user/installing.html
>
> Does this new version work for packages that need numba?
>
> How important are mips64el, ppc64
On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 at 21:14, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> Can you be more explicit on the reasons why you dislike the second sentence?
>
> It only says you should document why tests aren't ran in a package and
> encourages you to open a bug report.
I thought the second sentence was:
"As suc
Hi
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 14:38, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> We're nearly there (the transition page says it's 99% done), and when
> this transition is complete, then python3-defaults 3.11.6+ will be
> able to migrate to testing.
python3-defaults/3.11.6-1 with Python 3.12 as a supported version is
no
Hi Chiara
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 19:39, Chiara Marmo wrote:
> upstream kindly fixed the failing test in numpydoc for python 3.12 [1][2] and
> I have patched the 1.6.0 version
> Still autopkgetest is failing [3] because of an obsolete version of
> python3-tabulate.
> This is also stopping the upg
Hi Andreas
On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 18:15, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Is there
> any better way than editing debian/obitools.substvars in d/rules by
> adding some override_dh_gencontrol?
Remove the line:
Cython>=0.24
from requirements.txt.
Regards
Graham
Hi Matthias
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 at 18:24, Matthias Klose wrote:
> while we have not an 100% agreement to go ahead, I think we should aim for
> 3.11.
Action speaks louder than words, and there's been a whole lot of work
done to push this forward.
> The following steps would be:
>
> - accept t
Hi Timo, Stefano
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 18:46, Stefano Rivera wrote:
>
> Hi Timo (2022.12.22_12:56:20_+)
> > > There have been rebuilds in Ubuntu that give us some idea of how much
> > > work remains. I think it's tractable, but also will have some package
> > > casualties.
> > I have some sp
Hi Andrius
On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 at 07:13, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Am I right that whichever the choice, there will be only one supported
> Python version in bookworm?
Yes, I believe that was the decision made at DebConf 22.
> I believe there are many packages that will
> FTBFS with Python 3.11 a
Dear Python Team
Looking at the current state of the 'adding Python 3.11 as a supported
version' transition [1], the tracker [2] shows only 12 red packages
(excluding unknowns and packages not in testing) remaining, copied
below for reference.
We believe all FTBFS and autopkgtest regression bugs
Hi
On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 at 10:42, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> On 10/16/21 9:09 AM, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > Hi Ondřej,
> >
> > I see that isal package is limited to amd64, arm64 and kfreebsd-amd64.
> > Is there a particular reason for this? -- Is it possible to extend
> > support to other archs?
> >
Hi Diane
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 08:04, Diane Trout wrote:
> Does Mo Zhou want to review the commits to numba? Or should I push them
> to the main numba packaging repository? (I'm in the python, science,
> and med teams)
Numba is orphaned, see #935626, so I think go ahead and adopt the
package an
Hi Vincent
On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 10:54, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> src:monster-masher has no build dependencies on python2, the only
> binary package it builds (monster-masher) has no runtime dependencies
> on python2, and this package has no autopkgtests. There's actually not
> a single line of pyt
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 02:19, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> So: let's just make that automatic? Thoughts?
+1 from me.
Apparently, all that's required[1] is to give @janitor-bot commit
access to the repositories.
[1]
https://janitor.debian.net/lintian-fixes/#this-is-great-how-do-i-get-it-to-automatical
Hi Scott
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 06:41, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I've gone through and statused the issues currently listed on the package
> tracker for python3-defaults migration that are autopkgtest related [1]. I
> stuffed it into a pastebin [2].
Thanks for your work on this!
I filed bug #95
Hi Andreas
On Sun, 1 Dec 2019 at 20:36, Andreas Tille wrote:
> according to the answer to an issue I opened agains scikit-bio[1] the
> test suite would work with scipy version 1.3.1. I wonder what might be
> the reason to stick to version 1.2.2 instaed of upgrading to the version
> in experiment
Hi Andreas
On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 at 16:09, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Its not about testing. Its the usual build time test. If I'd do a
> source upload of this package it will FTBFS under the current state
> of the archive.
If you look on the numpy tracker page [1], you'll see there is a note:
"Thi
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 19:28, Scott Talbert wrote:
> Thanks. As an aside, what does the tilde at the end of the version number
> mean? I have seen that in control files before, but I've been unable to
> find anything in the documentation about it.
The tilde is to accommodate backports.
e.g. a b
Hi Scott
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 18:01, Scott Talbert wrote:
> However, there's one package that seems like it is going to cause a
> problem. I uploaded pytest-xdist 1.29.0-1, which *requires* pytest 4, so
> pytest-xdist won't migrate to testing until pytest 4 does. On the other
> hand, pytest 4
Hi Andreas
Try the following in debian/rules:
export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all,-pie
Hi
Any Project Admins for python-modules on Alioth around?
I sent a request to join on Alioth some time ago but it hasn't been approved.
My username on Alioth is 'ginggs-guest'.
I'd like to do some QA work on python-messaging [1], orphaned in bug #787110.
Python-messaging's VCS is already on Ali
20 matches
Mail list logo
