Re: Please upload PyZstd 0.16.2 to unstable

2024-10-14 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 01:45:04 +0900 yokota wrote: > Upstream updated PyZstd, and I uploaded python-pyzstd 0.16.2 to > salsa. https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-pyzstd Hi Hiroshi, uploaded since the package is in very good shape, although you actually do seem to have DM permissi

Re: request for removal of my packages from the DPT namespace

2024-06-20 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
*ping* *ping* *ping* On Thu, 23 May 2024 08:27:42 +0200 Jeroen Ploemen wrote: > *ping* *ping* > > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:21:51 +0200 > Jeroen Ploemen wrote: > > > *ping* > > > > > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 13:41:04 +0100 > > Jero

Re: request for removal of my packages from the DPT namespace

2024-05-22 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
*ping* *ping* On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:21:51 +0200 Jeroen Ploemen wrote: > *ping* > > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 13:41:04 +0100 > Jeroen Ploemen wrote: > > > Dear team admins, > > > > please delete the following packages from the DPT namespace on > >

Re: request for removal of my packages from the DPT namespace

2024-04-16 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
*ping* On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 13:41:04 +0100 Jeroen Ploemen wrote: > Dear team admins, > > please delete the following packages from the DPT namespace on > salsa: > > cheetah > jaraco.classes > jaraco.collections > jaraco.context > jaraco.text > nfoview >

Re: request for removal of my packages from the DPT namespace

2024-03-27 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:33:15 +0100 Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 3/19/24 13:41, Jeroen Ploemen wrote: > > Dear team admins, > > > > please delete the following packages from the DPT namespace on > > salsa: > > > > cheetah > > jaraco.clas

request for removal of my packages from the DPT namespace

2024-03-19 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
Dear team admins, please delete the following packages from the DPT namespace on salsa: cheetah jaraco.classes jaraco.collections jaraco.context jaraco.text nfoview ply puremagic python-autocommand python-jaraco.functools python-portend python-rarfile python-tempora python-yenc sabctools sabnzbdp

Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy

2024-03-01 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 07:21:57 + Julian Gilbey wrote: > These are really interesting points. Under the proposed system, I > presume that one could leave "privately maintained" packages within > the python-team area of salsa and still benefit from these automatic > changes without giving automat

Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy

2024-02-29 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 18:32:54 + Scott Kitterman wrote: > While I do take advantage of this for a few packages, I don't > personally care much either way. I suspect that packages will be > removed from team maintenance as a result though and I think that's > a bad idea. > > I'd prefer the cur

review for python-leather/0.4.0-1

2023-12-05 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
hi Ileana, I took a look at the python-leather package up for sponsorship in the Python team. Some issues came up during review: * possible unused build-deps on python3-six, -doc, dpkg-dev; * build-dep on furo could be marked !nodoc; * build-dep on sphinx-common is redundant, already a dependency

review for python-ciso8601/2.3.1-1

2023-11-09 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
hi Lance, I took a look at the python-ciso8601 package, put up for sponsorship in the Python team. Just missed you on IRC, so sending comments by email instead: * copyright: + incorrect info for upstream (license file in sources states 2014, does not mention a "tomst"); + missing info for

review for riscemu/2.2.5-1

2023-11-09 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
hi Bo, I took a look at the riscemu package, put up for sponsorship in the Python team. Some (mostly minor) issues came up: * copyright: + upstream years are incorrect (license file, sources have 2021-2022 resp. 2023). + leftover boilerplate comments. + empty line (dot) at the start of

review for astral/3.2-1

2023-09-05 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
hi Ileana, I took a look at the astral package put up for sponsorship in the Python team. Some minor issues came up: * unused build-deps on requests, tz; * outdated copyright years for upstream, see src/astral/__init__.py; * entire paragraph for apache-2.0 license is only a filepath. Also notice

review for lazy-loader/0.3-1

2023-08-07 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
Hi, I took a look at lazy-loader, up for sponsorship in the Python Team: * copyright: years outdated; * control: long description would benefit from some more details explaining what lazy loader is and does, e.g. a summary of [1]; * control: standards-version is slightly out-of-date; * watch: u

review for python-sepaxml/2.6.1-1

2023-05-23 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
hi Matthias, the package looks mostly fine on the technical side, with only some minor issues and suggestions for improvement of d/control and d/rules. The copyright file does need attention though, also in light of recent upstream commits that made significant changes. A fresh upstream release i

Re: New upstream version of sphinxext-opengraph

2023-01-19 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 14:45:41 -1000 Chiara Marmo wrote: > Dear list, > > A new upstream version of sphinxext-opengraph is available on salsa. Uploaded, thanks. pgpNhgurjV0RY.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: review for kivy/2.1.0-1

2023-01-05 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 01:17:40 -0800 Vincent Cheng wrote: > to the packaging, but otherwise I think this is ready for upload; > if Jeroen isn't planning on uploading kivy in the next day or so, My system has been resurrected, and I'm fine with the current state of the kivy packaging as well. I do s

Re: review for kivy/2.1.0-1

2022-12-27 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
hi Dean, thanks for making all those improvements. Only a couple of things remaining: * Copyright: try using standard license shortnames [1] where possible: Easing appears identical to BSD-3-clause; Khronos looks a lot like Expat. * Rules, lintian: are the files in kivy/tools/image-testsuite

review for pytest-fail-slow/0.3.0-1

2022-12-14 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
hi Ileana, I took a look at pytest-fail-slow, up for sponsorship in the Python team. Some repo issues: * It appears tags were not pushed, as there's no tags at all in the repo - not even for the imported upstream release - although the typical gbp workflow would handle that. * The upstream t

review for pygubu/0.27-1

2022-12-10 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
hi Bo, my comments for the pygubu package up for sponsorship in the Python team: * changelog: only a single entry is needed for an initial debian release. * copyright: + please remove the copyright statement at the start of the MIT license paragraph so that it contains only the license t

review for kivy/2.1.0-1

2022-12-08 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
hi Dean, I reviewed the kivy package up for sponsorship in the Python team: * There's quite a few lintian hits [1], and most of those look legit. Please fix the correctly identified issues, and add overrides for any false positives. * In the changelog, you should mention this is a team uploa

Re: librcsb-core-wrapper: (autopkgtest) needs update for python3.11: initialization of CorePyWrap raised unreported exception

2022-12-08 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 17:14:31 +0530 Nilesh Patra wrote: > > > SystemError: initialization of CorePyWrap raised unreported > > > exception autopkgtest [17:14:04]: test autodep8-python3 > Similar report is also filed for tagpy (Bug#1025201) -- could > someone please help in fixing these? Looks li

review for weresync/1.1.5-1

2022-12-03 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
hi Ileana, took a look a the weresync package you put up for sponsopship in the Python team: * weird, probably unnecessary d/source/include-binaries that lists the upstream signing key; * autopkgtest: + runs in extracted source dir, might not test installed package; + only tests with the de

Re: Review of Debian package pystray

2022-12-03 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
hi Claudius, took a look at the pystray package up for sponsorship in the Python team. Overall it's in really good shape, still a few comments left though: * control: the long description is really short and mentions neither supported environment nor any other pystray features. * tests: + pleas

Re: review for gtg/0.6-1

2022-11-07 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 16:07:56 +0100 François Mazen wrote: Thank you for making all those improvements. > > * copyright: > >  + public domain without explanation detailing exactly what > > exemption the files in question have from default copyright > > restrictions. > > I don't know what do you

Re: New upstream version of sphinxext-opengraph 0.7.0

2022-11-02 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 12:33:59 -1000 Chiara Marmo wrote: > Dear list, > I have committed to salsa the new version of sphinxext-opengraph > [1]. If someone could have a look, that would be great. > Thanks! Looks like there's a newer upstream release, fixing bugs in 0.7.0? pgp8WgYblHIhF.pgp Descrip

review for gtg/0.6-1

2022-11-01 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
hi Francois, I took a look at the gtg package put up for sponsorship in the Python team: * changelog: + multiple entries for revisions that did enter the archive (0.3.1-2 through 4) appear to have gone missing? + there's about a dozen open bugs against the old package, yet only a single o

Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1

2022-10-29 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 16:46:51 +0300 Ileana Dumitrescu wrote: > > I did just notice the upstream release contains several other > > files worth considering for removal: a bunch of windows > > executables [1]. > > I agree and can remove those from the source tarball too. To do that > with the cur

Re: review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1

2022-10-27 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 17:29:59 +0300 Ileana Dumitrescu wrote: > Thank you for the feedback! I made changes as you suggested. There > is a new upstream version that I also included in the new package. Great! The copyright stuff is a chore on packages like this, so thanks alot for seeing that throug

review for pipenv/2022.10.12-1

2022-10-22 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
hi Ileana, I took a look at the package update you prepared and put up for sponsorship in the Python team: * leftover boilerplate comments and examples remain throughout the packaging (control, rules, watch), please remove when unused. * changelog: isn't #941447 also fixed by the new release? S

Re: review for python-ssdpy

2022-10-04 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 11:56:30 -0400 Ben Westover wrote: > Thanks, I didn't catch that since I use sbuild instead of pbuilder. > I have set the environment variable CI = true which should disable > those tests. Unfortunately, it doesn't. The change suggested below does make 'CI=true' take effect,

review for python-ssdpy

2022-10-03 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
Hi Ben, * control: missing build-dep on python3-all? Needed to run the testsuite against all supported Python version rather than just the default one. * watch: regex "(\d\.\d.\d)" is overly specific, could easily miss upstream versions such as a hypothetical "1.5" or "1.4.10". Package ftb

Re: Bug#1007025: git-multimail 1.6.0 package review

2022-09-22 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:35:12 -0400 Antoine Beaupré wrote: > I think the simplest solution is not to rewrite the launcher, but to > rename it. So in debian/rules, you would simply do: > > override_dh_auto_install: > dh_auto_install > mv debian/git-multimail/usr/bin/git_multimail.p

Re: New upstream version for numpydoc

2022-09-04 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Sat, 3 Sep 2022 15:33:04 -1000 Chiara Marmo wrote: > I have opened merge requests on salsa for numpydoc [1] in order to > update to the last available upstream version 1.4.0 Any reason why you're no longer closing #1013376 when building your updated package against experimental seems to work

Re: sphinxext-opengraph 0.6.2 available for upload on salsa.

2022-03-11 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 12:42:48 -1000 Chiara Marmo wrote: > Dear list, > > a new version of sphinxext-opengraph (0.6.2) is available for > upload on salsa. Uploaded, thanks! pgph9YZjSJH6I.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: new upstream version (0.6.1) for sphinxext-opengraph

2022-02-25 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 14:35:05 -1000 Chiara Marmo wrote: > Dear list, > > a new version (0.6.1) of sphinxext-opengraph is ready for upload on > salsa [1]. Uploaded, thanks! pgpFolYaSjWEi.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: sphinxext-opengraph new upstream version and tests

2022-01-03 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 15:26:30 -1000 Chiara Marmo wrote: > Ready for upload? Uploaded with some minor changes. Thanks for your contribution. pgpSQMyHTArPC.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: sphinxext-opengraph new upstream version and tests

2022-01-02 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 17:25:34 -1000 Chiara Marmo wrote: > I think the configuration is better now, as the CI passed too. Using @builddeps@ may seem attractive at first, but is best reserved for autopkgtests that actually do a full build. In most other cases redundant extra stuff gets installed th

Re: sphinxext-opengraph new upstream version and tests

2021-12-31 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 14:27:09 -1000 Chiara Marmo wrote: > Dear list, Sandro, > > I have uploaded on salsa a new upstream version of > sphinxext-opengraph: > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/sphinxext-opengraph/ > > I have also modified the way how tests are run... but I'm still in >

Bug#985216: RFS: sabnzbdplus/2.3.6+dfsg-1+deb10u1 -- web-based binary newsreader with nzb support

2021-03-14 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian-python@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, Note that this update has been approved by the stable release managers, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984604 I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sabnzbdplus":