On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 09:01:34 +0200
Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi wrote:
> thanks for your work
Thanks for your guidance. This is very much appreciated.
Cheers,
Lorenz
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:04:20 +0500
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> We are frozen so nothing except targeted serious fixes should be
> uploaded to unstable.
Right. Sorry, my bad.
Cheers,
Lorenz
Hi,
I updated proxmoxer to upstream 1.1.1 (latest stable release). I've
pushed debian/master, upstream and pristine-tar branches now to salsa.
I did a smoke test (debian/rules clean, debian/rules build,
debian/rules binary) and the result looks like a respectable debian
package.
The only thing
Hi Elena,
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:41:41 +0100
Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote:
> Yes, please, a merge request would help: I've looked into it a few
> times already and wasn't able to finish it in the time I had.
>
> But since it's going into experimental, wouldn't it be better to
> package the
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 17:50:43 +0100
Lorenz Schori wrote:
> Version 1.0.4 has some small fixes for the ssh backend and some
> improvements for the http backend. Nothing major though. If it is
> viable to include that in bullseye, then why not. Also note that
> upstream changed
Hi Elena,
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 16:37:54 +0100
Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote:
> [...]
> Have you already checked how significant the difference is? I suspect
> that the delta would be too much to be reasonable even under the
> current freeze rules (and Prometheus PVE Exporter as a new package
>
Hi,
I am the author of Prometheus PVE Exporter[1]. I recently discovered
that there is only one somewhat exotic dependency left (proxmoxer[2])
which needs some love before Prometheus PVE Exporter itself could be
packaged for Debian. I'd like to bring that dependency up-to-date in a
first step and
7 matches
Mail list logo
