Steve Langasek wrote:
(that's just my subjective opinion, please don't start a flame war now)
It's a rather strongly worded opinion; if you want to avoid flame wars, you
might find it helpful to bring specific criticisms to the table instead of
just declaring a solution ugly. :)
++
/me whinges that switching to bzr for packaging in general would be a
much nicer thing overall, since then ubuntu downstream is pretty well
bzr...
(note: I use bzr for all of my other projects, so I have a vested interest)
However... _anything_ is an improvement over svn.
Monty
Piotr Ożarowski
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Monty Taylor mo...@inaugust.com wrote:
/me whinges that switching to bzr for packaging in general would be a
much nicer thing overall, since then ubuntu downstream is pretty well
bzr...
(note: I use bzr for all of my other projects, so I
Vincent Bernat wrote:
You may want to add Homepage field to source stanza of debian/control
and a debian/watch file (this will help the use of svn-buildpackage
too).
Moreover, there should be a better way to use Debian TinyMCE than just
removing almost everything with a very
Hi guys,
I've been told that I should ask here for help with sponsoring of debian
packages that are in python. If there's anyone who would like to upload
this for me, I'd appreciate it. It's mainly just to close an NMU bug.
The relevant files can be found at
http://debian.inaugust.com
plywood
On Thursday, Oct 30, 2003, at 20:59 US/Central, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:46:12PM -0600, Monty Taylor wrote:
I've been told that I should ask here for help with sponsoring of
debian
packages that are in python.
I thought the policy was never to ask on package specific lists
6 matches
Mail list logo
