Re: Convenience copies of python extensions

2011-10-21 Thread Tanguy Ortolo
. Do I have to undo this causing the ap to use the extension as a seperate external package? That would be better, yes specially if this library is already in Debian or if it is used by other packages and could be shared. -- ,--. : /` ) Tanguy Ortolo xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu irc://irc.oftc.net

Introduction

2011-10-12 Thread Tanguy Ortolo
in a Debian team before. Cheers, -- ,--. : /` ) Tanguy Ortolo xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu irc://irc.oftc.net/Elessar | `-'Debian Maintainer \_ ¹ Yes, I know git-svn, but it is still quite different from pure Git, and I am not sure this can be easily adapted to the packaging workflows

Re: Introduction

2011-10-12 Thread Tanguy Ortolo
. :-) But that may change and it is a generic tool that could be used by people outside of GNOME. But although it is not part of Python, it is written in Python and I think this is the point of PAPT, am I mistaking? -- ,--. : /` ) Tanguy Ortolo xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu irc://irc.oftc.net/Elessar

Re: Introduction

2011-10-12 Thread Tanguy Ortolo
else is XML. How did you come to that conclusion? The main script, itstool itself, is written in Python! My package does not depend on python for no reason… -- ,--. : /` ) Tanguy Ortolo xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu irc://irc.oftc.net/Elessar | `-'Debian Maintainer \_ signature.asc Description