On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
The 3.4 release is planned for March 16, so it shouldn't be too much of a
surprise to make 3.4 the default for the next Debian release, and hopefully be
able to drop 3.3.
\0/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
On 12/08/2013 03:04 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I've been working with gtimelog's upstream maintainer Marius, and with the
permission of the old gtimelog Debian maintainers, have added it to PAPT.
Please note that gtimelog was
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@debian.org wrote:
I try to keep an eye on what other distros are doing w.r.t. Python 3. Here
are Fedora's plans:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3_as_Default
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bkabrda/Py2to3GuidelineChanges
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote:
[Thomas Goirand, 2013-09-20]
Though my debpypi isn't good enough to be
released, I heard Piotr wrote the same kind of tool.
Shouldn't we go the same way, and encourage our users to use a kind of
wrapper around pip, so
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
4) Python modules from dpkg are borderline useless for developers. We
package modules so that apps can use them, not so that people can
develop with them.
Are they 'borderline useless' because they are
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
On 07/08/2013 10:10 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
There is no policy on this either way, so there's no mistake.
Well, the mistake is precisely to have no rule, IMO.
Agreed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
* Python 3.4 beta 1 is currently scheduled for November 23, 2013. What should
our plans be related to 3.4? My current thinking is that we could support
3.4 but not make it the default.
Why not make 3.4 default and get
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
Am 06.05.2013 19:45, schrieb Tshepang Lekhonkhobe:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
* Python 3.4 beta 1 is currently scheduled for November 23, 2013. What
should
our plans be related
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 23:50 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
We discussed /usr/bin/python2 symlink issue shortly and we all agreed
that we don't want Debian to use it (should helpers change shebangs back
to /usr/bin/python? Should lintian warn about it?) although we might
want to ship it with
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 10:09 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Overall, as you might have noticed, I have vastly reduced my involvement
in the Debian Python community. The reason is that all the crap that
happened in Debian is still a result of broken designs in Python itself.
I think there is a
Have you guys looked at the new module, Packaging, in Python 3.3? Will
it solve all the problems that Debian Python packaging has, or is it
still lacking?
sidenote: the same tool will be available for earlier Python versions as
distutils2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 20:11 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Do what you (plural) want, I don't care.
Personally, I want one helper. The consistency will make life much easier
for
new packagers, for documentation, and for helping focus the
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 07:51 +, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 23:34, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 20:06 +, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 20:05, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote:
[Barry Warsaw, 2011-06-09
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 12:16 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
What is the process for deprecating python-support? Who makes that
decision?
Add a lintian warning saying that it is deprecated.
Lintian
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 20:06 +, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 20:05, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote:
[Barry Warsaw, 2011-06-09]
What is the process for deprecating python-support? Who makes that
decision?
I'd ask Joss, Sandro and Jakub what they think first (if
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 23:39 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
[Barry Warsaw, 2011-06-07]
There is also a wiki page about how to convert from pysupport to dhpy2:
http://wiki.debian.org/Python/PythonSupportToDHPython2
but there's no similar list of packages that could/should be
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:42, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 23:39 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
but pysupport is not deprecated so you cannot file bugs and ask
people to convert now
Why the delay?
What
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 09:49, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote:
On 05/02/2011 04:45 PM, Arto Jantunen wrote:
How about concentrating on getting rid of dh_python and python-central
for wheezy? My understanding is that consensus about those two being
deprecated and needing to be removed should
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:13, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote:
On 05/03/2011 10:36 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 09:49, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote:
On 05/02/2011 04:45 PM, Arto Jantunen wrote:
How about concentrating on getting rid of dh_python and python
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:55, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name wrote:
Hello.
I have a lot of packaging experience for ALT Linux and some experience
with Python programming, but no experience with Debian Python packaging (I
have some understanding of general Debian packaging). I want to help
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 21:19, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Friday, October 15, 2010 05:45:24 pm Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
FYI: [I already mentioned that on #debian-python and in other places,
but it deserves a mail to debian-python as well]
I think that we should support
Hi,
I saw recently that RT did not list 2.6 as default Python as a release
goal. I also saw a thread talking about the problems related to 2.6.
Does this mean Squeeze won't use it by default or are u guys working
on it?
It always seems a great challenge everytime there's a switch of
defaults. Is
to the right list:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Dec 16, 2007 2:52 PM
Subject: python docs in contrib?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I was surprised to find python2.{4,5}-doc in contrib and wondered why?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Dec 16, 2007 6:16 PM, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 03:19:17PM +, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
to the right list:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Dec 16, 2007 2:52 PM
Subject: python
On 5/10/07, Gaetano Guerriero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings.
I was sondering why python-imaging is frozen to version 1.1.5 even in sid.
Version 1.1.6 came out six months ago, and Ubuntu Feisty has package for
it (same mantainer of debian) since december...
Maybe the maintainer hasn't
On 1/2/07, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandre Fayolle writes:
Am I the only one with a mixed feeling about this? I mean, we spent time
last spring updating our packages to use the new Python policy, write
nice loops in debian/rules to build for all versions specified by
On 1/15/07, Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gah, I meant to press control-Backspace, not control-Enter. Sorry.
On ma, 2007-01-15 at 16:28 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On ma, 2007-01-15 at 18:15 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Is there work done on this? If not may python2.5
Hi,
I tried to do some development using Etch's python2.5, but it fails to
import pygtk and gtk modules and this is a regression IIRC. v2.4 works
fine.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/2/07, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
I tried to do some development using Etch's python2.5, but it fails to
import pygtk and gtk modules and this is a regression IIRC. v2.4 works
fine.
pyversions --supported only
On 11/23/06, Carlos Galisteo de Cabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you refer to python-serial?
thanks...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
A few months ago, I saw tht pyserial was available in Etch. Now
apt-cache search returns nothing and I can't even import it in
interactive session. What happened to it?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I managed to remove python2.3 without problems on my system, meaning
that everyone uses python2.4. Are there packages which depend only on
python2.3, and if not, why is it still kept around?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On 10/21/06, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/21/06 05:13, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
I managed to remove python2.3 without problems on my system, meaning
that everyone uses python2.4. Are there packages which depend only
On 10/21/06, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless you haven't updated in a while, the only one (of the three)
strictly requiring python2.3 is bittorrent. That's according to the
packages.debian.org pages.
Actually, the opposite. bittorrent Depends: *python* (= 2.3). I
had updated
On 10/21/06, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/21/06, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/21/06 05:13, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
I managed to remove python2.3 without problems on my system, meaning
On 10/21/06, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/21/06, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 12:13:42PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
I managed to remove python2.3 without problems on my system, meaning
that everyone uses python2.4
On 10/21/06, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 12:13:42PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
I managed to remove python2.3 without problems on my system, meaning
that everyone uses python2.4. Are there packages which depend only on
python2.3
37 matches
Mail list logo
