Re: [Boost-build] Boost.Python: Build and Install with Python 2.4 and 2.5?

2008-05-01 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:30:32AM -0400, David Abrahams wrote: on Thu Mar 13 2008, Steve M. Robbins steve-AT-sumost.ca wrote: Actually, the only thing about Boost that causes grief to packagers is that the toolset name (e.g. gcc42) is embedded in the library filename. I just wrote a

Re: [Boost-build] Boost.Python: Build and Install with Python 2.4 and 2.5?

2008-05-01 Thread Stefan Seefeld
Steve, Steve M. Robbins wrote: It turns out to be simpler than that. With a small tweak to boost's Jamroot file, I'm now generating libraries without the toolset and without the Boost version decorations. I will use this for the upcoming Boost 1.35.0 Debian packages. By all means, could

Re: [Boost-build] Boost.Python: Build and Install with Python 2.4 and 2.5?

2008-03-13 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 09:11:25PM -0400, David Abrahams wrote: on Sat Feb 23 2008, Steve M. Robbins steve-AT-sumost.ca wrote: [...] This produces pairs of library files such as bin.v2/.../link-static/libboost_python-gcc42-1_34_1.a