Hi Bo (2022.11.19_05:05:19_+)
> One question:
> If I put the packahe under Debian Python team, should to change
> maintainer to DPT from QA team?
Yes.
And if it's in the Python Team it needs a human maintainer/uploader too.
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 02:06:04AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 10:04:04AM +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Hi Helmut (2022.11.04_11:36:41_+0200)
> And no, updating it to 3.4 does not fix the ftbfs.
Updating it to 3.4.1 might. It includes
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 10:04:04AM +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Helmut (2022.11.04_11:36:41_+0200)
> > And no, updating it to 3.4 does not fix the ftbfs.
>
> Updating it to 3.4.1 might. It includes this commit:
>
Hi Helmut (2022.11.04_11:36:41_+0200)
> And no, updating it to 3.4 does not fix the ftbfs.
Updating it to 3.4.1 might. It includes this commit:
https://github.com/DinoTools/python-ssdeep/commit/fce02106c07ff56a84097dec0df02fb00ef69dc7
which moves the setuptools import above the first distutils
Dear Helmut,
On 04.11.22 10:36, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Would someone handle dnstwist, which is the only remaining dependency?
I opened a corresponding upstream request:
https://github.com/elceef/dnstwist/issues/170
Peter
Control: tags -1 + upstream
On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 03:37:36PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: python-ssdeep
> Version: 3.1+dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a
6 matches
Mail list logo
