On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 10:06:06PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 22/02/02, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > First, remember that this tool is explicity for the subset of packages
> > containing pure-python modules that work with multiple versions of Python.
>
> Well, but that's a good point for start
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 10:16:09AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 18/02/02, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:48:02PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
[...]
> > Look at http://people.debian.org/~calvin/python-central/
OK, I promised I would have a look are python-central and
On 18/02/02, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:48:02PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Good plan; why not do that for python? How about a
> > /usr/sbin/python-pkgtool --install
> > /usr/sbin/python-pkgtool --remove
> Look at http://people.debian.org/~calvin/python-central/
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 06:31:49PM -0500, Jim Penny wrote:
> OK, I am clearly not going to persuade you how wrong-headed ;-) you are,
> so proceed.
>
> Please use the debconf model. If there are enough clear benefits, both
> packagers and administrators will want to use your system.
[... snip
OK, I am clearly not going to persuade you how wrong-headed ;-) you are,
so proceed.
Please use the debconf model. If there are enough clear benefits, both
packagers and administrators will want to use your system.
Here is something that would make this enormously more palatable to me.
Event:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 01:35:25PM -0500, Jim Penny wrote:
> Objection 1: Autocompilation can result in progams that compile but
> do not work as expected.
> Examples: scope rule changes. Inheritance Changes. Arithmetic Changes.
This has nothing to do with the organization of the
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:48:02PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:33:55PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
>
> > On 17/02/02, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > and this one package with one set of install/remove scripts supports
> > > emacs20, emacs21, xemacs21. When a new emacs
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 07:02:02PM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:48:02PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Good plan; why not do that for python? How about a
> >
> > /usr/sbin/python-pkgtool --install
> > /usr/sbin/python-pkgtool --remove
>
> Look at http://peopl
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:48:02PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Good plan; why not do that for python? How about a
>
> /usr/sbin/python-pkgtool --install
> /usr/sbin/python-pkgtool --remove
Look at http://people.debian.org/~calvin/python-central/
Should we have a vote for the binary name? Cu
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:33:55PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 17/02/02, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > and this one package with one set of install/remove scripts supports
> > emacs20, emacs21, xemacs21. When a new emacs is installed, the
> > installed elisp packages are byte-compiled for it, a
10 matches
Mail list logo
