Re: Bug#197875: python2.3: module dbm is missing

2003-06-25 Thread Martin v. =?iso-8859-15?q?L=F6wis?=
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: emulating the BDB 1.85 API can be done using the db_185.h header of the libdb4.1-dev package, not sure about the BDB on-disk format. Emulating the API is irrelevant. In Python 2.3, the bsddb package will emulate the bsddb module API. Using db_185.h of

Re: Bug#197871: Bug#197875: python2.3: module dbm is missing

2003-06-21 Thread Nicolas Chauvat
Encolpe DEGOUTE wrote: Not, just my boss. I will try to convince him to use bsddb. Thanks for all. You may also suggest Stéphane to use http://www.logilab.org/pylint to check that your code complies to your company's coding standard. -- Nicolas|\ _,,,---,,_ CHAUVAT ZZzz

Re: Bug#197875: python2.3: module dbm is missing

2003-06-20 Thread =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=
Matthias Klose wrote: Next thing to investigate, if the archives generated by the gdbm implementation are binary compatible with the ones created by the libdb1 implementation... Most definitely not: gdbm produces a different binary format than db1 (which is BDB 1.85). Traditionally, the 'dbm'