Hi Guillaume,
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 06:24:57PM -0500, Guillaume Marcais wrote:
> if I am attached to the name Jellyfish for the main software itself, the
> script bindings have seen little use (I believe) up to now. Renaming python
> module to dna_jellyfish, bio_jellyfish, or some other suggesti
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Guillaume,
>
> when Diego intended to package python-jellyfish a discussion about the
> duplicate name came up. I even became aware that your jellyfish code
> provides Python bindings and I intend to provide these as Debian package
> as
Hi Guillaume,
when Diego intended to package python-jellyfish a discussion about the
duplicate name came up. I even became aware that your jellyfish code
provides Python bindings and I intend to provide these as Debian package
as well. This would lead to a conflict to the completely unrelated
mu
> That bit of policy doesn't officially kick in yet since these aren't both in
> the
> archive yet. The policy is about consensus finding and not winning and
> losing.
> That's why I recommended discussing with the upstreams (and hopefully getting
> them in direct communication).
Thanks for
On Thursday, December 31, 2015 06:32:43 PM Diego M. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 02:07:05PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Diego M. Rodriguez
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:56:20PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > > I think the
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 02:07:05PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> That won't solve the problem, since both will provide the python module
> jellyfish
Fair point indeed, and I fully agree that ideally the problem should be solved
at the python module level.
I'm wondering if you or other senior,
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 02:07:05PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> That won't solve the problem, since both will provide the python module
> jellyfish
I agree. BTW, I just became aware about the Python bindings of the DNA
Jellyfish by discussing with Diego. :-)
I'm not in a hurry with uploading
Agreed. I'll leave it to the maintainer/ITP owner to sort things out.
Scott K
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 12:59:17 PM Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> In the meantime, I suggest we both avoid uploading any python*-jellyfish
> packages
>
> Paul
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Scott Kitterman
That won't solve the problem, since both will provide the python module
jellyfish
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Diego M. Rodriguez
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:56:20PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I think the respective maintainers should talk and then discuss with
> their
> > ups
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:56:20PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I think the respective maintainers should talk and then discuss with their
> upstreams as the collision potential isn't just in Debian.
I'm chiming in as the (prospective) maintainer of the ITP python-jellyfish
package, just to no
In the meantime, I suggest we both avoid uploading any python*-jellyfish
packages
Paul
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> I think the respective maintainers should talk and then discuss with their
> upstreams as the collision potential isn't just in Debian.
>
> Scott K
I think the respective maintainers should talk and then discuss with their
upstreams as the collision potential isn't just in Debian.
Scott K
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 12:27:37 PM Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Just FYI - there's a Python module called Jellyfish about to be uploaded;
> can we res
Just FYI - there's a Python module called Jellyfish about to be uploaded;
can we resolve the name collision early?
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/jellyfish
Paul
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 11:52:07 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Tues
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 11:52:07 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 12:30:14 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I realised that for jellyfish[1] Python bindings can be activated. I
> > tried to do so and configuring and building works fine - but I have no
> > ide
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 12:30:14 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I realised that for jellyfish[1] Python bindings can be activated. I
> tried to do so and configuring and building works fine - but I have no
> idea how to sensibly install the files into the python-jellyfish
> package. Any
Hi,
I realised that for jellyfish[1] Python bindings can be activated. I
tried to do so and configuring and building works fine - but I have no
idea how to sensibly install the files into the python-jellyfish
package. Any idea how to call swig/python/setup.py or do something else
to install the
16 matches
Mail list logo
